2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.103943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune phenotype of the endometrium in patients with recurrent implantation failures after the transfer of genetically tested embryos in assisted reproductive technology programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, we hypothesized that if the increased number of CD56+CD16+CD57+ uNK cells was greater than the decreased number of CD56+CD94+ uNK cells, this would result in increased CD56+ uNK cells in women with RIF, and if the decreased number of CD56+CD94+ uNK cells was greater than the increased number of CD56+CD16+CD57+ uNK cells, this would result in decreased numbers of CD56+ uNK cells in women with RIF. Others have found no statistical difference in CD56+ uNK cells between the two populations of RIF and fertile, 44 which is consistent with our findings. Therefore, it may be more meaningful to study CD56+ NK cell subpopulations rather than CD56+ NK cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, we hypothesized that if the increased number of CD56+CD16+CD57+ uNK cells was greater than the decreased number of CD56+CD94+ uNK cells, this would result in increased CD56+ uNK cells in women with RIF, and if the decreased number of CD56+CD94+ uNK cells was greater than the increased number of CD56+CD16+CD57+ uNK cells, this would result in decreased numbers of CD56+ uNK cells in women with RIF. Others have found no statistical difference in CD56+ uNK cells between the two populations of RIF and fertile, 44 which is consistent with our findings. Therefore, it may be more meaningful to study CD56+ NK cell subpopulations rather than CD56+ NK cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, one study found no difference in IL-15 mRNA and IL-18 mRNA expression between the two groups. 44,65 IL-15 expression was also found to be higher in RIF than in the control group. 62 We hypothesized that this may be due to different test methods and reagents, which may contribute to different results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…25 Studies have demonstrated a role of uterine NK cells in pathologies such as recurrent pregnancy loss, RIF, and infertility overall. 13,24,[26][27][28][29] However, it is not known how uterine NK cells gain their way to the lumen of the uterine cavity and what is their impact on the implantation. In our study, we have conducted for the first time an assessment of the cellular composition of uterine fluid, revealing that immune cells within the uterine cavity, not solely confined to the endometrium, may play a crucial role in supporting implantation of the blastocyst.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of the histopathological approach is that uNK cell counting is mostly semi-quantitative, which depends on both the quality and representativeness of the biopsy sample, as well as on the experience of the examining physician (pathologist). The second laboratory approach—which is of significant importance in everyday clinical practice—is the endometrial immune phenotyping of biopsy samples or uterine lavage fluid (and eventually experimentation with menstrual blood) in women with unexplained recurrent implantation failure through flow cytometry [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ]. More recently, molecular biological approaches (e.g., using single-cell RNA sequencing or mass spectrometry-based proteomics) may also be suitable for making detailed molecular and cellular maps of endometrium in health and disease [ 66 ].…”
Section: Current Histological Knowledge and Immunohistochemistry Of U...mentioning
confidence: 99%