2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune response to two different dosing schedules of the anthrax vaccine precipitated (AVP) vaccine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because LT contains two toxin components, we used this principle to show that changes in rPA, but not rLF, concentration followed this inverse correlation with ED 50 of all test sera (except that of anti-rLF sera, which showed an expected inverse correlation with rLF concentration). The rPA component was the determining factor of neutralizing potencies of all test sera because those samples contained either anti-PA antibodies only (i.e., from rPA plus Alhydrogel vaccination) or substantially greater anti-PA neutralizing content relative to that of anti-LF that is expected in sera derived from AVA vaccinations with or without CPG 7909 (11,12). Indeed, most anthrax vaccines in development are designed to induce a strong neutralizing anti-PA antibody titer as the predominant protective mechanism (11)(12)(13)(14), in which case the rPA concentration, rather than the rLF concentration, would be the dominant component in those respective TNAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because LT contains two toxin components, we used this principle to show that changes in rPA, but not rLF, concentration followed this inverse correlation with ED 50 of all test sera (except that of anti-rLF sera, which showed an expected inverse correlation with rLF concentration). The rPA component was the determining factor of neutralizing potencies of all test sera because those samples contained either anti-PA antibodies only (i.e., from rPA plus Alhydrogel vaccination) or substantially greater anti-PA neutralizing content relative to that of anti-LF that is expected in sera derived from AVA vaccinations with or without CPG 7909 (11,12). Indeed, most anthrax vaccines in development are designed to induce a strong neutralizing anti-PA antibody titer as the predominant protective mechanism (11)(12)(13)(14), in which case the rPA concentration, rather than the rLF concentration, would be the dominant component in those respective TNAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8B to D). This additive contribution of each antibody fraction was not significant when the ratio of anti-rPA to anti-rLF serum activity was increased to the natural ratios of Ͼ10:1 ob- served after AVA immunization (11,12) (Fig. 8E and F).…”
Section: Biochemical Characterization Of Rlf Lotsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike the AVA vaccine, AVP contains all three toxin components, with roughly 7.9 g/ml PA, 1.9 g/ml LF, and detectable amounts of EF (26). Vaccination with AVP consists of 4 intramuscular doses, administered at 0, 3, 6, and 32 weeks, with annual boosters (28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%