2017
DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2017.18.s1.323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune responses in pigs and cattle vaccinated with half-volume foot-and-mouth disease vaccine

Abstract: With the current commercial foot-and-mouth disease vaccine, inoculating twice increases the formation of denatured meat due to granuloma or residual adjuvant at the injection site in pigs, resulting in economic loss. Therefore, we investigated protective antibody levels after reducing the amount of adjuvant in the vaccine. Field applicability of the experimental vaccine, made with a new adjuvant ISA 201, was tested by vaccinating farm animals with half-volume doses (1 mL/animal) of commercial vaccine and monit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is desirable to use vaccines that can protect against at least 2 different topotype strains in Korea. Previously, a vaccine was developed using the virus responsible for the SEA topotype outbreak in November 2010 in Korea; however, that vaccine showed low immunity from the virus that caused the 2014 outbreak [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is desirable to use vaccines that can protect against at least 2 different topotype strains in Korea. Previously, a vaccine was developed using the virus responsible for the SEA topotype outbreak in November 2010 in Korea; however, that vaccine showed low immunity from the virus that caused the 2014 outbreak [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although these vaccine strains provided protection, some vaccine strains belonging to different topotypes induced insufficient antibody reactions after immunization or induced delayed immunity. Previously, an FMD vaccine was developed using the virus that caused the 2010 (November) outbreak in Korea; this vaccine was evaluated for its immune response against the virus strain that caused a recent outbreak, and it was observed that it has a different immune reactivity, one that induced almost no production of antibodies [7]. Therefore, this result suggested that the same SEA topotype vaccine strains do not always guarantee protection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the immune response and oil residue in the vaccination site, the O TWN antigen (15 µg/mL, 1 dose), 10% Al(OH) 3 , and saponin (0.5 mg/mL/dose) were mixed with each adjuvant (ISA15, ISA 206) [ 13 ]. A 1/10 dose of vaccine was administered to C57BL/6 7-week-old mice (5 mice/group) vis the intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC) inoculation, and the fatty tissue (inguinal fat) route.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of FMDV particles in a sample of each fraction was determined using a lateral flow device (BioSign FMDV Ag; Princeton BioMeditech, USA). Before its use in the animal experiment, innocuity of the pre-PEG treatment supernatant was tested through a BHK-21 cell line and LF-BK cell line at least twice to check that no cytopathic effect (CPE) had occurred, thereby confirming the absence of live virus in the supernatant [19]. The 146S virus particles were quantified using the spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 259 nm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%