2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune responses to implants – A review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
1,109
1
17

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,203 publications
(1,138 citation statements)
references
References 249 publications
11
1,109
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Biocompatibility of the constructs can be modified by chemical and architectural properties that modulate immune response and macrophage invasion. It has been reported that hydrophilic implants were generally better tolerated by the host [45]. Moreover, fibrous, parallel oriented substrates were shown to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine production when compared to 2-D films or randomly oriented fibres of the same material [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biocompatibility of the constructs can be modified by chemical and architectural properties that modulate immune response and macrophage invasion. It has been reported that hydrophilic implants were generally better tolerated by the host [45]. Moreover, fibrous, parallel oriented substrates were shown to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokine production when compared to 2-D films or randomly oriented fibres of the same material [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A favorable macrophage polarization can create an osteogenic microenvironment that improves osteogenesis, whereas an unfavorable macrophage polarization may exacerbate inflammation and destroy the tissue–biomaterial integration 12, 45. In general, the M2 macrophage phenotype accounts for antiinflammation and tissue regeneration, whereas the M1 macrophage phenotype is proinflammatory and causes tissue destruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "endotoxin" is mostly used synonymously with LPS, which is a potent inducer of inflammation. In combination with the biomaterial, it tends to escalate a fibrotic response or a foreign body reaction, thus leading to bio-incompatibility (Franz, Rammelt, Scharnweber & Simon, 2011). FDA has strict regulations on contamination levels allowed in medical application (USP, 2011a, b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%