2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2007.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune Responsiveness in the Neonatal Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
61
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to our knowledge, the effect of sow vaccination on fetal PCV2 replication in utero has not been investigated to date. Detectable differences in the immune response following vaccination of pregnant animals and differences in immune regulation in the uterus during pregnancy have been reported (22,40). In the current study, sows were vaccinated after confirmation of pregnancy due to the limited availability of PCV2-naïve sows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, to our knowledge, the effect of sow vaccination on fetal PCV2 replication in utero has not been investigated to date. Detectable differences in the immune response following vaccination of pregnant animals and differences in immune regulation in the uterus during pregnancy have been reported (22,40). In the current study, sows were vaccinated after confirmation of pregnancy due to the limited availability of PCV2-naïve sows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, vaccination is one of the most practical measures for protecting calves. Since the presence of maternally-derived antibodies is known to reduce the effectiveness of vaccines [18], it is important to consider the timing of maternal antibody decay when young calves are vaccinated [3]. Although vaccination is ideally carried out in consideration of a previously measured antibody titer, testing all calves on farms is unrealistic due to the cost and time required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, dicha proporción puede considerarse elevada con respecto al 19,2% reportado por Beam et al (2009) en fincas lecheras en los Estados Unidos. En ese mismo país, también se ha reportado que alrededor de un 35% de las terneras sufren de FTIP, convirtiéndose en un factor económico importante para los productores de leche (Morein et al, 2007), ya que tienen que invertir importantes cantidades de dinero en el tratamiento de enfermedades causadas por agentes patógenos. Asimismo en otro estudio se reportó una mortalidad en terneras en la etapa de pre-destete promedio de 7,9% y una gran proporción de estas muertes se le atribuyen a una FTIP (NAHMS, 2007).…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusiónunclassified