1989
DOI: 10.2307/3282875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune Suppression Induced by the Brown Ear Tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann, 1901

Abstract: The brown ear tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus suppressed in vivo and in vitro immune responses in the rabbit. Humoral responses were suppressed during infestation; however, suppression was transient and was unrelated to previous exposure of hosts to similar tick infestations. Immune suppression was caused by putative lymphocytotoxic factor(s) in tick salivary secretions as evidenced by in vitro lymphocytotoxicity assays. In an identical study of Rhipicephalus zambeziensis, a closely related rhipicephalid, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number and frequency of tick bites determine the development of acquired resistance and cutaneous reactivity to tick feeding, which is mediated in part by circulating and homocytotropic antibodies and cell-mediated immune responses (5,32,33). Tick feeding has been shown to reduce the ability of the host to develop an antibody response (7,13,31). While it was not possible to document all previous arthropod bites that might have altered the calreticulin antibody status of our subjects, any such effect would have been mitigated by testing each subject following a well-defined tick exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number and frequency of tick bites determine the development of acquired resistance and cutaneous reactivity to tick feeding, which is mediated in part by circulating and homocytotropic antibodies and cell-mediated immune responses (5,32,33). Tick feeding has been shown to reduce the ability of the host to develop an antibody response (7,13,31). While it was not possible to document all previous arthropod bites that might have altered the calreticulin antibody status of our subjects, any such effect would have been mitigated by testing each subject following a well-defined tick exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo and collaborators (19) isolated two proteins from I. scapularis saliva (ISL929 and ISL1373) that are able to decrease O 2 2 production by neutrophils through an as-yet unknown mechanism. In addition, immunomodulatory mechanisms are not necessarily conserved in different tick species even within the same family (27). For this reason, we evaluated the effect of I. ricinus SGE and saliva on neutrophil ROS production.…”
Section: Effect Of I Ricinus Sge On Ros Production By Activated Humamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] Indeed, the alternative pathway of the complement is inhibited 15,16 and the activity of lymphoid cells is modified. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] For tick infestation, interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-10 induction and IL-2 and interferon gamma inhibition [24][25][26] are observed, indicating a polarized Th2 host immune response. 13 It has also been observed that during the bloodmeal, new mRNAs are induced in the salivary glands, leading to the synthesis of a wide range of new proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%