1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00199854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune surveillance and natural resistance: an evaluation

Abstract: Concepts in tumour immunology are changing fundamentally. Around 1970 tumour immunology contained the following related concepts: Thousands of tumour cells arise de novo each day. Tumour cells are antigenic in their host. All these antigenic tumour cells are killed by a strong immune surveillance system. A more likely set of concepts looks as follows: Tumour cells do not arise frequently. Tumour cells may be antigenic or not. There is no need to postulate a very strong immune surveillance or natural resistance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data (Tables 1 and 2) fully corroborate Den Otter's conclusions that neither the T-cell [6] nor NKcell/macrophage cell compartments [5,6] exert a significant and fundamental surveillance of incidence of spontaneously arising tumors. We are inclined to agree completely with his conjecture [5,6] that spontaneous tumors do not arise frequently and that there is no experimentally founded need to postulate a very strong immune surveillance or natural resistance system(s).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present data (Tables 1 and 2) fully corroborate Den Otter's conclusions that neither the T-cell [6] nor NKcell/macrophage cell compartments [5,6] exert a significant and fundamental surveillance of incidence of spontaneously arising tumors. We are inclined to agree completely with his conjecture [5,6] that spontaneous tumors do not arise frequently and that there is no experimentally founded need to postulate a very strong immune surveillance or natural resistance system(s).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…We are inclined to agree completely with his conjecture [5,6] that spontaneous tumors do not arise frequently and that there is no experimentally founded need to postulate a very strong immune surveillance or natural resistance system(s). Our findings (Tables 1 and 2) actually provide direct evidence for Den Otter's inferences [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We realize that this cannot be a general conclusion for every situation as T-cells may also be important as effector cells in certain defined tumor systems [5]. Actually this is illustrated by the results of a mathematical analysis of the role of macrophages and lymphocytes in the tumor rejection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, the observations that athymic nude mice lacking T cell function do not develop many spontaneous tumours and that immunodeficient patients exhibit a very restricted range of neoplasms [3,221 seem to stand against this view. At present, concepts in tumour immunology are changing fundamentally, and there is no need to postulate rather obscure strong immune or natural resistance barriers [4]: if a tumour cell arises de novo, which is considered to be a very infrequent situation [3], it may or may not be attacked by immune or natural resistance mechanisms with their limited potential. However, data to support the idea that these mechanisms induce regression of spontaneously arising tumours do not seem sufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%