INTRODUCTIONIt is generally accepted that dendritic cells (DCs) are the most efficient and powerful antigen presenting cells and play a center role in exciting T cell immune reactions. T-cell mediated immune responses, especially Hepatitis B virus (HBV) specific-cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response, may play an important role in resolving HBV infection [1,2] . hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) pulsed DCs can activate lymphocytes to become HBsAg-specific CTLs or specific CD4 + T cells in vivo [3] . Shimizu et al [4] immunized HBV transgenic mice with DCs loading HBsAg, and found that DC vaccine could break tolerance to HBV and induce an effective anti-viral immune response. Chen et al [5] reported that HBsAg-pulsed DCs from the peripheral blood could effectively suppress HBV replication in chronic hepatitis B patients. However, anti-HBV immune effects of DC vaccine are varied and instable. This may be due to the diversity of DC vaccine preparations; however, the main cause may be the insufficiency of DC vaccines. For example, some researchers carried out similar immune therapy in volunteers, but no evident immune response was shown [3,[6][7][8] . Therefore, the basic research of DC vaccine as well as how to improve the immune response to DC vaccine is still a significant challenge.Recently, it was reported that uric acid (UA) could stimulate DCs to mature, promote DCs to present foreign antigens and stimulate T lymphocytes [9,10] . These findings demonstrate the adjuvant effects of uric acid and encourage the potential application of uric acid in
RESULTS:The cytotoxicities of HBsAg-specific-CTLs, generated after immunization of HBsAg-pulsed-DCs and uric acid, were 68.63% ± 11.32% and significantly stronger than that in the control groups (P < 0.01).Compared with control groups, in mice treated with uric acid and HBsAg-pulsed-DCs, the spleen T cell proliferation to HBsAg re-stimulation was stronger (1.34 ± 0.093 vs 1.081 ± 0.028, P < 0.01), the level of IFN-γ secreted by splenocytes was higher (266.575 ± 51.323 vs 135.223 ± 32.563, P < 0.01) , and IL-4 level was