1995
DOI: 10.1016/0034-5288(95)90087-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunisation of sheep against heartwater with inactivated Cowdria ruminantium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The veterinary literature contains convincing reports that immunization of animals with inactivated E. ruminantium stimulates their ability to survive an ordinarily highly lethal infection (24,25,28). Similar enhanced survival follows vaccination with live attenuated E. ruminantium or deliberate infection of animals followed by treatment with tetracycline (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The veterinary literature contains convincing reports that immunization of animals with inactivated E. ruminantium stimulates their ability to survive an ordinarily highly lethal infection (24,25,28). Similar enhanced survival follows vaccination with live attenuated E. ruminantium or deliberate infection of animals followed by treatment with tetracycline (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bacteria are chemically inactivated, formulated with a suitable adjuvant, and administered subcutaneously. The original vaccine was developed in Guadeloupe, using the local Gardel isolate (66), and a modified version was subsequently produced in Zimbabwe, using the local Crystal Springs isolate (67). An early problem with the inactivated vaccine was the difficulty, and therefore high cost, of preparing enough of the antigenic material for large-scale use.…”
Section: Inactivated Vaccine Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports have highlighted that immunization against phylogenetically related organisms such as Ehrlichia ruminantium and Ehrlichia risticii, using inactivated organisms can induce protection against live challenge (Rikihisa 1991;Dame, Mahan & Yowell 1992;Van Vliet, Jongejan & Zeijst 1992;Martinez, Maillard, Coisne, Sheikboudou & Bensaid 1994;Mahan, Andrew, Tebele, Burridge & Barbet 1995;Martinez, Perez, Sheikboudou, Debus & Bensaid 1996;Mahan, Kumbula, Burridge & Barbet 1998;Dumler, Barbet, Bekker, Dasch, Palmer, Ray, Rikihisa & Rurangirwa 2001;Mahan, Smith, Kumbula, Burridge & Barbet 2001). In this study, we demonstrate that immunization of German Shepherd dogs (GSDs) with inactivated E. canis organisms in combination with Quil A induces humoral and cellular immune responses which exert a suppressive effect on rickettsaemia following live E. canis challenge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…For immunization, freshly harvested live E. canis organisms were inactivated with an equal volume of 0.8 % β-propiolactone in sterile PBS on ice for 2 h and frozen overnight at -20°C as described by Mahan et al (1995) for inactivation of E. ruminantium. Inactivation of the organisms was confirmed by staining with 6-carboxy-fluoresceine-diacetate (6-CFDA; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) which only stains live cells.…”
Section: Preparation Of E Canis Antigenmentioning
confidence: 99%