1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92552-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunisation With a Polyvalent Pneumococcal Vaccine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found 12 reports of 13 randomised comparisons of polyvalent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines for inclusion with a total of 45,226 subjects ([12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] Table 1). The report by Austrian et al, 1980 [15] comprised two separate trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found 12 reports of 13 randomised comparisons of polyvalent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines for inclusion with a total of 45,226 subjects ([12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] Table 1). The report by Austrian et al, 1980 [15] comprised two separate trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three comparisons [12,13,14] reported outcomes in 21,152 healthy, mostly young, adults likely to have a normal immune system. Ten [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] reported outcomes on 24,074 people likely to have an impaired immune system because of age or ill health.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RCTs used in that meta-analysis and published between 1980 and 2006 did not found any evidence about PPSV23 as protective vaccine to avoid pneumonia [40,41,53-58]. It means that the conclusion of Moberley et al is based on only two RCTs: Kaufman (1948) [13] and Riley (1977) [59]. It is important to note that these RCTs [13,59] did not identified infection by S. pneumoniae but Diplococcus pneumoniae , which is a different microorganism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that the conclusion of Moberley et al is based on only two RCTs: Kaufman (1948) [13] and Riley (1977) [59]. It is important to note that these RCTs [13,59] did not identified infection by S. pneumoniae but Diplococcus pneumoniae , which is a different microorganism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite numerous studies, contradictory results have been reported and several meta-analyses have been inconclusive to date. Excluding earlier trials in younger adults,[21,22] prospective RCTs have failed to demonstrate a significant protective effect of the vaccination. However, several case-control and cohort studies have reported a considerable protective effect (ranging between 40-80%) in preventing IPD in different populations [23-28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%