2017
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunization Against Group B Streptococci vs. Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Peripartum Pregnant Women and their Neonates: A Review

Abstract: Group B streptococcus (GBS) is an organism that has an immense global impact on neonatal morbidity and mortality. GBS is known to colonize the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts of infected pregnant women. Transmission to the neonate is achieved during labor and delivery. Complications of neonatal infection include sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia. Preventative measures are needed to reduce the disease burden. The current method of prophylaxis being utilized is intrapartum antibiotics. Though effective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current primary clinical approach to reducing invasive GBS infection is intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis (IAP), involving the pre-administration of penicillin and macrolide antibiotics to pregnant women with GBS pathogens after being screened [ 5 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. However, IAP only reduces early-onset disease (EOD) infections by more than 80% and is ineffective against late-onset disease (LOD) [ 5 , 10 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current primary clinical approach to reducing invasive GBS infection is intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis (IAP), involving the pre-administration of penicillin and macrolide antibiotics to pregnant women with GBS pathogens after being screened [ 5 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. However, IAP only reduces early-onset disease (EOD) infections by more than 80% and is ineffective against late-onset disease (LOD) [ 5 , 10 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is an increasing resistance in GBS strains, and the use of antibiotics can disrupt the establishment of normal flora in newborns, impacting their normal development [ 5 , 10 ]. Maternal immunization with a GBS vaccine is considered a superior prevention strategy as it not only addresses the remaining burden of EOD and LOD but also prevents the stillbirths and premature births caused by GBS during pregnancy while avoiding early infant susceptibility to GBS threats [ 11 , 14 , 15 ]. Moreover, it reduces reliance on prophylactic antibiotics and minimizes antibiotic resistance concerns [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes implementing and improving intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, given to carrier GBS pregnant women during delivery, and developing vaccines for maternal immunization during pregnancy. 7 - 9 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes implementing and improving intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, given to carrier GBS pregnant women during delivery, and developing vaccines for maternal immunization during pregnancy. [7][8][9] Knowing the epidemiology and risk factors for GBS provides data that could be used to estimate disease distribution in certain groups and geographical areas in Saudi Arabia and plan the development of appropriate GBS screening programs. At the the Maternity and Child Hospital, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah, Saudi Arabia, where the study was carried out, the screening for GBS was carried out for high risk cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%