2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-3235-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immuno-interferometric sensor for the detection of influenza A nucleoprotein

Abstract: Influenza A virus, both seasonal and pandemic, has the potential to cause rampant devastating disease around the world. The most relied upon methods of viral detection require days, skilled workers, and laboratory settings to complete properly. Here, we report two methods for the detection of the nucleoprotein from inactivated influenza A (IFA-NP), a patented polymer-protein antibody orientation immuno-method, termed ALYNGSA, and a newly fabricated optical label-free Fabry-Perot interferometric immunosensor. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunosensors have found widespread applications in food industry, environmental and pollutants, biotechnology, pharmaceutical chemistry and clinical diagnostics [ 22 27 ]. Several types of immunosensors, such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [ 3 , 28 , 29 ] and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) [ 30 – 34 ], optical interferometric [ 35 , 36 ], label-free microcantilever [ 37 ] and fluorescent [ 38 ] have been researched as alternatives to the conventional influenza virus detection methods. These biosensors have shown analytical potential, but they lack subtype specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunosensors have found widespread applications in food industry, environmental and pollutants, biotechnology, pharmaceutical chemistry and clinical diagnostics [ 22 27 ]. Several types of immunosensors, such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [ 3 , 28 , 29 ] and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) [ 30 – 34 ], optical interferometric [ 35 , 36 ], label-free microcantilever [ 37 ] and fluorescent [ 38 ] have been researched as alternatives to the conventional influenza virus detection methods. These biosensors have shown analytical potential, but they lack subtype specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, comparison of the LOD with those of other techniques previously reported for detecting the same analyte. The LOD of our SERS immunoassay system (8 ng mL À1 ) is much lower than those of uorescence-based LFIA (250 ng mL À1 ), 26 an immune-interferometric sensor (1 mg mL À1 ), 27 and comparable to that of electrochemical immunoassay (e-ELISA) (10 ng mL À1 ). 28 3.3.3 Selectivity.…”
Section: Sers Immunoassaymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The device includes also moving stages, which makes detection of multiple chips possible. The feasibility of the sensor has been demonstrated with influenza A nucleoprotein assay reaching detection limit of 1 μg/ml [74].…”
Section: Label-free Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most of the assay chips are very small in size and often based on microfluidics requiring thus only minute volumes of reagents and sample, the instrumentation needed for quantification is still rather large [29,74], or portable desktop devices [26,70,71] and very few handheld systems exist [15,34]. Also, a computer is often needed [74,80], which raises the costs of the device and increases the size of the instrumentation needed. Therefore, miniaturization of instrumentation towards truly handheld devices or development of totally instrument-free quantitative assays is the key issue.…”
Section: Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%