Enzyme Immunoassays 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1169-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunoassay Classification and Commercial Technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An immunoassay in a reagent excess format , (also known as immunometric, two-site noncompetitive, or sandwich assay) generally involves the use of two antibodies targeting different epitopes (one for antigen capture and another labeled for detection) that can be added in excess as compared to the analyte. At low analyte concentration, unoccupied capture binding sites are always available, but as signal measurement occurs only at the occupied binding sites, the signal is directly proportional to the amount of analyte present.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An immunoassay in a reagent excess format , (also known as immunometric, two-site noncompetitive, or sandwich assay) generally involves the use of two antibodies targeting different epitopes (one for antigen capture and another labeled for detection) that can be added in excess as compared to the analyte. At low analyte concentration, unoccupied capture binding sites are always available, but as signal measurement occurs only at the occupied binding sites, the signal is directly proportional to the amount of analyte present.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low analyte concentration, unoccupied capture binding sites are always available, but as signal measurement occurs only at the occupied binding sites, the signal is directly proportional to the amount of analyte present. In general, a reagent excess immunoassay , provides considerable benefits in terms of assay robustness, sensitivity, specificity, kinetics, and extended working range as compared to the reagent limited competitive assays. In competitive format, the analyte and the labeled tracer analyte compete for a limited number of binding sites of a single-type antianalyte antibody used, and the signal decreases with increased analyte concentration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most common methods to group the different EIAs is by the process of detection; either direct or indirect detection. The difference is the method in which the antigen (molecule of interest) is bound to the antibody of the plate and then detected [288]. In the direct EIA method, the antigen and the other constituents of the sample adsorb onto the base of a micro-well.…”
Section: Enzyme Immunoassaymentioning
confidence: 99%