2016
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunoassay or LC-MS/MS for the measurement of salivary cortisol in children?

Abstract: Immunoassay and LC-MS/MS were largely comparable in the interpretation of salivary cortisol dynamics in stress research. But the IA method revealed a restricted accuracy in the measuring range below 5 nmol/L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to achieve this aim, future studies should rigorously verify the self-reported awakening times (e.g., by actigraphy) and sampling times using electronic monitoring devices (e.g., MEMS® caps). Second, we converted salivary cortisol concentrations to adjust for measurement bias due to antibody cross-reactivity and steric effects of further saliva matrix components (Miller et al, 2013; Bae et al, 2016). Therefore, the provided reference ranges only apply to salivary cortisol as measured by a compatible LC/MS-MS protocol and would need to be adjusted whenever cortisol data from other assays are compared with our values and ranges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to achieve this aim, future studies should rigorously verify the self-reported awakening times (e.g., by actigraphy) and sampling times using electronic monitoring devices (e.g., MEMS® caps). Second, we converted salivary cortisol concentrations to adjust for measurement bias due to antibody cross-reactivity and steric effects of further saliva matrix components (Miller et al, 2013; Bae et al, 2016). Therefore, the provided reference ranges only apply to salivary cortisol as measured by a compatible LC/MS-MS protocol and would need to be adjusted whenever cortisol data from other assays are compared with our values and ranges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assays were often adopted for saliva analysis without any further adjustments, which entails large between-assay variability and the overestimation of salivary cortisol at low concentrations as compared to unbiased mass spectrometric methods (Miller et al, 2013; Bae et al, 2016). These measurement peculiarities become particularly problematic for research designs that lack internal control groups and would therefore need to rely on reference values that have been derived using incompatible assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noteworthy, the methods for collecting salivary cortisol, testing and analyzing cortisol concentration levels have improved in more recent years. These include immunoassay or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the measurement of salivary cortisol [ 37 , 38 ]. Therefore, there is need to update literature to include these new methods when investigating the relationship between cortisol concentration levels and PTSD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, saliva cortisol concentration was measured using ELISA. Although, studies found that immunoassay analysis of saliva cortisol concentration largely comparable to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), immunoassay values were consistently greater than LC-MS/MS and the limit of detection was 5 nmol/L (0.18 μg/dL) or more [55]. Despite limitations, these data support the need for further investigations into the interactions among circadian rhythms of cortisol with rest-activity rhythms, sleep metrics and maternal-fetal health.…”
Section: Considerations Of Study Population and Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%