Immunoassays: Analytical and Clinical Performance, Challenges, and Perspectives of SERS Detection in Comparison with Fluorescent Spectroscopic Detection

Abstract

Immunoassays (IAs) with fluorescence-based detection are already well-established commercialized biosensing methods, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA). Immunoassays with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) detection have received significant attention from the research community for at least two decades, but so far they still lack a wide clinical commercial application. This review, unlike any other review that we have seen, performs a three-dimensional performance comparison of SERS IAs vs. fluorescence IAs. First, we compared the limit of detection (LOD) as a key performance parameter for 30 fluorescence and 30 SERS-based immunoassays reported in the literature. We also compared the clinical performances of a smaller number of available reports for SERS vs. fluorescence immunoassays (FIAs). We found that the median and geometric average LODs are about 1.5–2 orders of magnitude lower for SERS-based immunoassays in comparison to fluorescence-based immunoassays. For instance, the median LOD for SERS IA is 4.3 × 10−13 M, whereas for FIA, it is 1.5 × 10−11 M. However, there is no significant difference in average relative standard deviation (RSD)—both are about 5–6%. The analysis of sensitivity, selectivity, and accuracy reported for a limited number of the published clinical studies with SERS IA and FIA demonstrates an advantage of SERS IA over FIA, at least in terms of the median value for all three of those parameters. We discussed common and specific challenges to the performances of both SERS IA and FIA, while proposing some solutions to mitigate those challenges for both techniques. These challenges include non-specific protein binding, non-specific interactions in the immunoassays, sometimes insufficient reproducibility, relatively long assay times, photobleaching, etc. Overall, this review may be useful for a large number of researchers who would like to use immunoassays, but particularly for those who would like to make improvements and move forward in both SERS-based IAs and fluorescence-based IAs.