Gelonin-based immunotoxins vary widely in their cytotoxic. Results were matched with cytotoxicity measurements made at equivalent concentration and exposures. Unexpectedly, when matched internalization and cytotoxicity data were combined, a conserved internalized cytotoxicity curve was generated that was common across experimental conditions. Considerable variations in antigen expression, trafficking kinetics, extracellular immunotoxin concentration, and exposure time were all found to collapse to a single potency curve on the basis of internalized immunotoxin. Fifty percent cytotoxicity occurred when ϳ5 ؋ 10 6 toxin molecules were internalized regardless of the mechanism of uptake. Cytotoxicity observed at a threshold internalization was consistent with the hypothesis that endosomal escape is a common, highly inefficient, rate-limiting step following internalization by any means tested. Methods designed to enhance endosomal escape might be utilized to improve the potency of gelonin-based immunotoxins.Immunotoxins are a promising approach to the targeted delivery of highly potent, cancer-specific, cytotoxic agents. Immunotoxins are frequently composed of a targeting moiety (derived from antibodies or other cell-binding proteins) either chemically conjugated or genetically fused to highly cytotoxic plant or bacterial protein toxins. Clinical success for immunotoxins has been mostly limited to hematological malignancies due to transport limitations in solid tumors (1). Such limitations have been extensively studied experimentally (2) and with several computational models (3, 4).The potency of a particular immunotoxin is dependent on the ability to deliver the toxin to the cytoplasm, which is commonly considered to be the rate-limiting step. For some native toxins such as ricin, intracellular delivery is achieved through lectin binding, followed by internalization and toxin release with membrane fusion or retrograde trafficking (5). Immunotoxins attempt to recreate this scenario by replacing the indiscriminate lectin binding with cancer-specific antigen binding as a means of targeting and internalization (6). Subsequent intracellular trafficking, release, and endosomal escape are often achieved using existing toxin characteristics, translocation domains, protease cleavage sites, disulfide bonds, and/or signaling peptides (7-10). However, the inclusion of toxins with domains facilitating cytoplasmic access can also lead to increased nonspecific toxicity in vivo (11,12).Gelonin is a plant toxin and classified as a type I ribosomeinactivating protein because it lacks any cell-binding or cytoplasmic delivery domains. Recombinant gelonin (rGel) 2 is an ϳ30-kDa N-glycosidase with activity similar to the ricin A chain but exhibiting better stability and lower immunogenicity (13,14). The use of rGel in tumor-targeted cytotoxic agents has been well studied (15, 16). Furthermore, rGel has been shown to be active without cleavage from the binding domain and without negative impact on the targeting agent's pharmacokinetics (...