Without any doubt has checkpoint inhibition change the landscape of melanoma treatment as well as our therapy paradigms. Using just up to 4 infusions of CTLA-4-blocking antibody ipilimumab in 3-week intervals was sufficient to demonstrate improved overall survival and a long-term benefit in roughly 20% of treated patients. This clinical result was achieve despite undisputed treatment stop after 4 applications, low response rates of 10-15% and PFS between 2-3 months. In light of less severe toxicity application of PD1 and PD1-L antibodies and clinical protocol schemes ranging between 1 year, 2 years and unlimited duration the question arises how long we need to treat. Prospectively collected results are missing and only few respectively analysed data are available. Various scenarios will be discussed and available data incorporated. Only randomized and prospectively trial data will answer this question finally.
SY1.3Choice of immunotherapy vs. targeted therapy in first line treatment for BRAF-mutant melanoma G. Long* Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, AustraliaImmune checkpoint inhibitors and MAP kinase pathway targeted therapies have revolutionized the management of advanced melanoma, and significantly prolong the overall survival of patients with this disease. Without head to head comparison data for either therapy, choice of first-line drug treatment is difficult. Landmark overall survival rates from clinical trials are difficult to compare, given the number of active therapies that may prolong survival. The landmark progression-free survival may be more appropriate. Data from subgroup analyses of large clinical trials, as well as patientcentred factors, help guide clinicians in their choice of first-line therapy. In the absence of mature data, perceived clinical differences between these two classes of drugs have driven perceptions of appropriate first-line therapy choice, namely; rates of primary resistance vs. acquired resistance, duration of response, kinetics at progression, and activity of drug in second-and third-line settings.
SY1.5Update on mucosal and uveal melanoma P. Lorigan* The Christie NHS FT, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United KingdomMucosal melanoma makes up 1% of all melanomas in a Caucasian population, although the proportion is much higher, up to 23%, in a Chinese population. The most common sites are sino-nasal, ano-rectal and vulvovaginal. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment. However complete surgical resection with clear margins is often difficult to achieve due to the anatomical location of tumour. Narrow margin resection with adjuvant radiotherapy is now a standard of care, but achieving this without extensive surgery is often not possible. Furthermore, despite good local control with surgery and radiotherapy, the long term prognosis is poor, with 1-year survival of 80% but 5-year survival of just 25%, compared to 80% for cutaneous melanoma. Systemic treatment options for mucosal melanoma remain limited, w...