Aims
Guidelines support the role of Bâtype natriuretic peptide (BNP) and aminoâterminal proâBNP (NTâproBNP) for risk stratification of patients in programmes to prevent heart failure (HF). Although biologically formed in a 1:1 ratio, the ratio of NTâproBNP to BNP exhibits wide interâindividual variability. A report on an Asian population suggests that molar NTâproBNP/BNP ratio is associated with incident HF. This study aims to determine whether routine, simultaneous evaluation of both BNP and NTâproBNP is warranted in a European, Caucasian population.
Methods and Results
We determined BNP and NTâproBNP levels for 782 Stage A/B HF patients in the STOPâHF programme. The clinical, echocardiographic, and biochemical associates of molar NTâproBNP/BNP ratio were analysed. The primary endpoint was the adjusted association of baseline molar NTâproBNP/BNP ratio with newâonset HF and/or progression of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). We estimated the Câstatistic, integrated discrimination improvement, and the categoryâfree net reclassification improvement metric for the addition of molar NTâproBNP/BNP ratio to adjusted models. The median age was 66.6Â years [interquartile range (IQR) 59.5â73.1], 371 (47.4%) were female, and median molar NTâproBNP/BNP ratio was 1.91 (IQR 1.37â2.93). Estimated glomerular filtration rate, systolic blood pressure, left ventricular mass index, and heart rate were associated with NTâproBNP/BNP ratio in a linear regression model (all PÂ <Â 0.05). Over a median followâup period of 5Â years (IQR 3.4â6.8), 247 (31.5%) patients developed HF or progression of LVD. Logâtransformed NTâproBNP/BNP ratio is inversely associated with HF and LVD risk when adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, vascular disease, obesity, heart rate, number of years of followâup, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and baseline NTâproBNP (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.55â0.91; PÂ =Â 0.008). However, molar NTâproBNP/BNP ratio did not increase the Câstatistic (Î â0.01) and net reclassification improvement (0.0035) for prediction of HF and LVD compared with NTâproBNP or BNP alone. Substitution of NTâproBNP for BNP in the multivariable model eliminated the association with HF and LVD risk.
Conclusions
This study characterized, for the first time in a Caucasian Stage A/B HF population, the relationship between NTâproBNP/BNP ratio and biological factors and demonstrated an inverse relationship with the future development of HF and LVD. However, this study does not support routine simultaneous BNP and NTâproBNP measurement in HF prevention programmes amongst European, Caucasian patients.