1993
DOI: 10.1080/00034983.1993.11812754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunodiagnosis of dracunculiasis by dot-ELISA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41 Other groups have used soluble antigen fractions extracted from adult female worms or first-stage larvae to develop ELISA, dot ELISA, and Falcon assay screening test ELISA methods that are easier to use and more amenable to large-scale surveys. 19,20,23,24,42 The ELISA results confirmed that antibody responses increase in the prepatent period and decline following resolution of the infection. 19,[21][22][23] Although ELISA specificity was often improved by focusing on the IgG 4 antibody response, cross-reactivity with sera from onchocerciasis patients was consistently observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…41 Other groups have used soluble antigen fractions extracted from adult female worms or first-stage larvae to develop ELISA, dot ELISA, and Falcon assay screening test ELISA methods that are easier to use and more amenable to large-scale surveys. 19,20,23,24,42 The ELISA results confirmed that antibody responses increase in the prepatent period and decline following resolution of the infection. 19,[21][22][23] Although ELISA specificity was often improved by focusing on the IgG 4 antibody response, cross-reactivity with sera from onchocerciasis patients was consistently observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…5 Sera from endemic normal individuals (claiming to have never had a patent D. medinensis infection despite living in a highly endemic area) responded only weakly with specific IgG1 and IgG4 compared with individuals with patent or postpatent infections. 5,6 This study elaborates on previous studies by analyzing levels of specific IgG1, IgG4, and IgE, as well as the concentration of total IgE in sera from individuals whose parasitologic status in relation to the prepatent, patent, and postpatent stages of infection were carefully determined. The postpatent category was further divided into four subcategories differing with respect to the time elapsed since the previous period of patency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[4][5][6][7] However, little is known about the relationship between the humoral responses and infection status (i.e., prepatent, patent, postpatent and those claiming to have never had a patent infection). Briefly, previous studies indicated that individuals in a prepatent and patent stage of infection responded similarly with total specific immunoglobulins, 4 and individuals in a patent and postpatent stage responded similarly with total specific immunoglobulins and specific IgG1, IgG4, and IgE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%