2022
DOI: 10.4081/ejh.2022.3418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunofluorescence signal intensity measurements as a semi-quantitative tool to assess sarcoglycan complex expression in muscle biopsy

Abstract: Sarcoglycanopathies are highly heterogeneous in terms of disease progression, muscular weakness, loss of ambulation and cardiac/respiratory involvement. Their clinical severity usually correlates with the residual protein amount, which makes protein quantification extremely relevant. Sarcoglycanopathy diagnosis is genetic, but skeletal muscle analysis - by both immunohistochemistry and Western blot (WB) - is still mandatory to establish the correct diagnostic process. Unfortunately, however, WB analysis cannot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluorescence images were acquired under 63× objective, with excitation laser sources of 405 nm, 499 nm, 553 nm, and 653 nm and high efficiency Leica HyD detector, and processed using LAS X software (Leica). Intensity of fluorescence signal for E-cadherin and ZO-1 was quantified by performing line scan using ImageJ 1.54d (39). Mean of maximum intensity value of each peak was determined by taking the peak intensity value from at least four peaks per line scan and normalizing it by the value obtained from non-pathogenic E. coli infected monolayers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence images were acquired under 63× objective, with excitation laser sources of 405 nm, 499 nm, 553 nm, and 653 nm and high efficiency Leica HyD detector, and processed using LAS X software (Leica). Intensity of fluorescence signal for E-cadherin and ZO-1 was quantified by performing line scan using ImageJ 1.54d (39). Mean of maximum intensity value of each peak was determined by taking the peak intensity value from at least four peaks per line scan and normalizing it by the value obtained from non-pathogenic E. coli infected monolayers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%