2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunogenicity of sequences around HIV-1 protease cleavage sites: Potential targets and population coverage analysis for a HIV vaccine targeting protease cleavage sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, mutations that disrupt the cleavage of individual sites or alter the order in which sites are cleaved result in aberrant particles that have significantly reduced infectivity [6]. Although other publications previously reported that certain CS were more conserved than others, they only analyzed a very limited number of HIV-1 variants and site sequences [3], [27], [28]. Thus, to our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate the conservation rate in 11 CS within Gag and GagPol precursors and to define the consensus sequences in each site using a large sequence dataset including all Group M subtypes and most CRF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, mutations that disrupt the cleavage of individual sites or alter the order in which sites are cleaved result in aberrant particles that have significantly reduced infectivity [6]. Although other publications previously reported that certain CS were more conserved than others, they only analyzed a very limited number of HIV-1 variants and site sequences [3], [27], [28]. Thus, to our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate the conservation rate in 11 CS within Gag and GagPol precursors and to define the consensus sequences in each site using a large sequence dataset including all Group M subtypes and most CRF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a limited number of studies have previously evaluated the natural variation within gag and CS [3], [5], [12], [28], [32], [33]. However, these have mainly focused on subtypes B and/or C and they have analyzed a smaller dataset or a limited number of CS in most cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations