2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.08.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunoglobulin Class (IgG, IgM) Determination by Dithiothreitol in Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 IgM antibodies have also been implicated in triggering a positive serologic crossmatch; however, the clinical relevance of IgM in transplantation has been questioned. 23 In the setting of an incompatible serologic crossmatch, our practice has been to repeat the test after treatment of the recipient's serum with the reducing agent dithiothreitol to inactivate IgM, so that only IgG antibody is considered. The opposite situation involving an incompatible virtual crossmatch with a compatible serologic crossmatch could derive from the enhanced sensitivity of the solid-phase assay, from a threshold level that is set too low such that antibodies may be suspected but are not definitively confirmed, or from the detection of noncomplement-fixing antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 IgM antibodies have also been implicated in triggering a positive serologic crossmatch; however, the clinical relevance of IgM in transplantation has been questioned. 23 In the setting of an incompatible serologic crossmatch, our practice has been to repeat the test after treatment of the recipient's serum with the reducing agent dithiothreitol to inactivate IgM, so that only IgG antibody is considered. The opposite situation involving an incompatible virtual crossmatch with a compatible serologic crossmatch could derive from the enhanced sensitivity of the solid-phase assay, from a threshold level that is set too low such that antibodies may be suspected but are not definitively confirmed, or from the detection of noncomplement-fixing antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm autoantibodies as the cause of false positive results, an auto-crossmatch was needed (28).…”
Section: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (Elisa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is often a result of autoantibodies in the recipient serum. This can be overcome by addition of Dithiothreitol (DTT) which helps prevent predominantly IgM autoantibody mediated complement activation and allows only IgG (donor specific antibodies) [3]. False negative reactions may occur when DSA levels are too low to result in activation of the complement cascade or if the antibodies are of the type that does not cause complement activation [4].…”
Section: A Review Of Crossmatch Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%