We evaluated the impact of intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), which was given at ages 3, 4, and 9 months through the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI), on the development of antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum in Mozambique. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG subclass antibodies specific to whole asexual parasites and to recombinant MSP-1 19 , AMA-1, and EBA-175 were measured at ages 5, 9, 12, and 24 months for 302 children by immunofluorescence antibody tests and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Antibody responses did not significantly differ between children receiving IPTi with SP and those receiving a placebo at any time point measured, with the exception of the responses of IgG and IgG1 to AMA-1 and/or MSP-1 19 , which were significantly higher in the SP-treated group than in the placebo group at ages 5, 9, and/or 24 months. IPTi with SP given through the EPI reduces the frequency of malarial illness while allowing the development of naturally acquired antibody responses to P. falciparum antigens.Malaria remains one of the major infectious diseases globally, causing up to 3 million deaths and close to 5 billion episodes of clinical illness per year (7). In areas characterized by hyperendemic transmission, the greatest burden of malaria occurs in children less than 12 months of age (38); consequently, infants in sub-Saharan Africa are the main target population for any malaria control tool.Intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) that consists of the administration of a full dose of an antimalarial within the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) has proven to reduce the risk of malaria in this vulnerable group (37). This strategy has gained increasing interest, and several intervention trials evaluating the efficacy of IPTi in the reduction of malaria morbidity have been and are still being carried out in several sub-Saharan countries (Tanzania, Ghana, Senegal, Mozambique, Gabon, and Kenya) as part of an international consortium (www.ipti-malaria.org). However, before setting any policy recommendation for the large-scale implementation of IPTi for malaria control, it is necessary to fully evaluate the consequences that this early preventive intervention may have later in life.An important issue that needs to be considered is the impact that IPTi may have on the development of naturally acquired immunity to malaria. Early studies of continuous malaria chemoprophylaxis raised concerns regarding the loss of or delay in the acquisition of protective immunity (16,23,34). Weekly chemoprophylaxis between 2 and 11 months of age in infants in Tanzania significantly reduced the incidence of malaria and anemia during the first year of life, but the risk increased in the second year after stopping the intervention (26), suggesting that protection against Plasmodium falciparum infection during infancy had delayed the development of immunity to malaria. However, subsequent studies of IPTi in Tanzania (37) and Mozambique (24) showed that, as ...