1969
DOI: 10.1042/bj1150065p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunoglobulins in the serum and mucus of the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the systemic and mucosal antibody responses of fish appear to occur separately (1, 35-39, 42, 45, 48), the actual mechanisms and sites of cutaneous antibody induction, production, and secretion have yet to be determined (18,36,47). Antibodies detected in the mucus of the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.), ayu (Plectoglossus altivelis), sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus), and channel catfish are physically and immunologically identical to those isolated from the blood yet do not appear to arise by transduction (19,20,22,26,30,34). For example, experimental evidence from studies with the sheepshead (a common marine fish) showed that antibodies isolated from the blood, subsequently labeled with I 125 , and injected intravenously back into the same fish were not detected in the cutaneous mucus or bile (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the systemic and mucosal antibody responses of fish appear to occur separately (1, 35-39, 42, 45, 48), the actual mechanisms and sites of cutaneous antibody induction, production, and secretion have yet to be determined (18,36,47). Antibodies detected in the mucus of the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.), ayu (Plectoglossus altivelis), sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus), and channel catfish are physically and immunologically identical to those isolated from the blood yet do not appear to arise by transduction (19,20,22,26,30,34). For example, experimental evidence from studies with the sheepshead (a common marine fish) showed that antibodies isolated from the blood, subsequently labeled with I 125 , and injected intravenously back into the same fish were not detected in the cutaneous mucus or bile (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-documented non-specific defence mechanisms (Fletcher 1982) and specific immune response of the fish host (St. Louis-Cormier et al 1984) could also influence resistance to monogenean invasion. Thus, a number of active non-specific substances such as proteases (Hjelmeland et al 1983), trypsin (Braun et al 1990), lysozyme (Lie et al 1989) and specific antibodies (Fletcher & Grant 1969, Bradshaw et al 1971, Lobb & Clem 1981, St. Louis-Cormier et al 1984 have been detected in fish mucus. As both the resistance of brown trout to ectoparasite invasion and the epidermis change seasonally (Pickering 1977, Pickering & Christie 1980 and the composition of fish mucus varies during a Gyrodactylus sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous flow of water through the opercular chambers which provides an exchange of oxygen probably aggravates the risk of ddditional exposure of the gills to the ambient pollutants. The continuous secretion of slime by the gills and by the inner opercular lining might provide an important safety coating for the gills since slime is known to act as a lubricant and to provide mechanical protection, has an osmoregulatory function, prevents colonization of parasites, f.ungi, and bacteria, and contains various types of compounds that can support several chemical and im~nunological reactions (Van Oosten 1957, Fletcher & Grant 1969, Rosen & Cornford 1971, Cameron & Endean 1973, Pickering 1974). According to Arillo & Melodia (1990), fish mucus constitutes a kind of barrier between a fish and its environment and some mucus components may have a de-toxifying function counteracting ambient toxins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%