1995
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemical and serological evaluation of CD44 splice variants in human ovarian cancer

Abstract: Summary The surface glycoprotein CD44 is widely distributed in different tissues. In contrast to healthy tissue, tumour samples show a more complex pattern of CD44 expression, indicating a loss of splice control. Beside cell-surface expression, the measurement of soluble CD44 in serum of cancer patients could be useful in early diagnosis and assessment of disease status. We evaluated the surface expression of CD44 isoforms in 22 ovarian cancer patients by means of immunohistochemistry. Additionally, we investi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In oral cancer patients, in which around a 50% decrease in serum DPP-IV activity has been reported, a correlation between sCD26 and CD26+ T was found, and the number of T lymphocytes and PBL and the amount of CD26 in T lymphocyte plasma membranes were significantly less than in healthy subjects (Uematsu et al, 1996;. Both possibilities can explain the donor-dependent variations, but the second one seems more probable in the cases of hemicolectomy or rectoragy (some of the lower values of the BPI group), except the Dukes' stage D cases with high sCD26 values, perhaps associated with a high proliferative (hepatic) cellular state, or with a later activation of PBL as suggested in CRC and ovarian tumours for the soluble CD44v6 glycoprotein (Sliutz et al, 1995;Yamane et al, 1999). It seems, then, necessary to collect the lymphocyte count and other immune parameters of the patients in future studies of CRC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In oral cancer patients, in which around a 50% decrease in serum DPP-IV activity has been reported, a correlation between sCD26 and CD26+ T was found, and the number of T lymphocytes and PBL and the amount of CD26 in T lymphocyte plasma membranes were significantly less than in healthy subjects (Uematsu et al, 1996;. Both possibilities can explain the donor-dependent variations, but the second one seems more probable in the cases of hemicolectomy or rectoragy (some of the lower values of the BPI group), except the Dukes' stage D cases with high sCD26 values, perhaps associated with a high proliferative (hepatic) cellular state, or with a later activation of PBL as suggested in CRC and ovarian tumours for the soluble CD44v6 glycoprotein (Sliutz et al, 1995;Yamane et al, 1999). It seems, then, necessary to collect the lymphocyte count and other immune parameters of the patients in future studies of CRC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…colorectal cancer, gastrointestinal lymphoma, nonHodgkin's lymphoma and cervical cancer (Jalkanen et al, 1991;Joensuu et al, 1993a;Wielenga et al, 1993;Kainz et al, 1995). However, CD44 has been shown to be down-regulated after malignant transformation of certain cell types (Salmi et al, 1993) and the prognostic value of CD44 isoform expression in ovarian and breast cancers is discussed controversially (Joensuu et al, 1993b;Kaufmann et al, 1995;Sliutz et al, 1995;Uhl-Steidl et al, 1995). It may be speculated that the role of CD44 as a metastasis mediator in these hormonally regulated malignancies is impaired by hormonal interference with biological properties of CD44.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversely, Gansauge et al [13]reported that sCD44v6 was significantly reduced in patients with pancreatic carcinoma, and that low serum levels of sCD44v6 were significantly associated with a poor prognosis. It has been reported that there was no significant correlation between the concentration of sCD44 isoforms and tumor progression, or prognosis in ovarian carcinoma [14], renal carcinoma [15], and bladder carcinoma [16]. However, as there have been no longitudinal studies, an association between serum levels of sCD44v6 and the prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer has not been clearly evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%