2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemical evaluation of two antibodies against PD-L1 and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in epithelioid peritoneal malignant mesothelioma: A RENAPE study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the tumour cells in our samples expressed PDL1, which is in line with recently published data showing that PDL1 are rarely expressed in mesothelioma cells [ 37 ]. PD1-positive immune cells were found exclusively in E-MpMs, and they were located intratumoural and within ELSs in the large majority of cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…None of the tumour cells in our samples expressed PDL1, which is in line with recently published data showing that PDL1 are rarely expressed in mesothelioma cells [ 37 ]. PD1-positive immune cells were found exclusively in E-MpMs, and they were located intratumoural and within ELSs in the large majority of cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results showed that PD-L1 expression does not appear to be significantly associated with survival despite a trend toward a poorer prognosis with PD-L1 expression in ≥50% on tumor cells. The absence of a significant association with survival is in agreement with two recent studies, in which a specific antibody (SP142) (38) and four different antibodies were employed (17). This finding was observed even when we compared survival with PD-L1 expression on TILs, and with the combined expression of tumor cells and TILs.…”
Section: Pd-l1 ≥1% Pd-l1 <1% ----------------------------------------supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Then, 299 duplicate publications were excluded, and 153 studies were screened by title and abstract. Subsequently, 119 studies were discarded and 34 studies 9 , 18 23 , 27 53 were left for eligibility assessment by full-text examination. Eighteen studies were excluded for different reasons: one study did not detect PD-L1 expression in sera samples other than tumor tissues, 37 11 studies did not present sufficient data for meta-analysis, 9 , 38 , 39 , 42 48 , 52 two studies did not use unique cut-off value, 40 , 50 one study did not test PD-L1 expression, 41 one study was a letter to the editor, 49 and two studies recruited patients with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma tumors other than MPM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighteen studies were excluded for different reasons: one study did not detect PD-L1 expression in sera samples other than tumor tissues, 37 11 studies did not present sufficient data for meta-analysis, 9 , 38 , 39 , 42 48 , 52 two studies did not use unique cut-off value, 40 , 50 one study did not test PD-L1 expression, 41 one study was a letter to the editor, 49 and two studies recruited patients with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma tumors other than MPM. 51 , 53 Finally, 16 studies were included in our meta-analysis. 18 23 , 27 36 The flow chart of the article screening process is shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%