2018
DOI: 10.21276/apjhs.2018.5.2.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemical expression of MUC1 in different grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations let us know that the carcinoma with an active proliferation were only showing positivity for MUC1. Also, are in similar with the results obtained in the study by Shobitha et al, 20 Kumar MH et al 18 and Nitta et al 12 The cytoplasmic and membranous staining of MUC1 in the squamous epithelial cells may be associated to its cytoplasmic and transmembrane subunits respectively.…”
Section: Normal Cellssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These observations let us know that the carcinoma with an active proliferation were only showing positivity for MUC1. Also, are in similar with the results obtained in the study by Shobitha et al, 20 Kumar MH et al 18 and Nitta et al 12 The cytoplasmic and membranous staining of MUC1 in the squamous epithelial cells may be associated to its cytoplasmic and transmembrane subunits respectively.…”
Section: Normal Cellssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The other tissue samples which can be taken up as positive control for mucin 1 are gastrointestinal carcinoma, salivary ductal tissue, urothelial carcinoma, lung carcinoma, 10 breast carcinoma and salivary gland carcinoma tissues. These are according to studies conducted by Suguru yonezawa et al, 11 Nitti et al, 12 Xialong et al, 13 Zhonghua et al, 14 Farzana Mahomed et al, 15 Sukhwinder et al, 16 Guosheng et al, 17 M. Harishkumar et al, 18 Arush Thakur et al 19 and KC Shobhita et al 20 The localization of this transmembrane glycoprotein is interpreted as brown coloured cytoplasmic and membranous staining which were regarded positive for MUC1. Similar MUC1 staining pattern was observed in most of the studies done by Nitti et al, 12 Suguru Yonezawa et al, 11 Xialong et al, 13 Zhonghua et al, 14 Farzana Mahomed et al, 15 Sukhwinder et al, 16 Guosheng et al, 17 M. Harishkumar et al, 18 Arush Thakur et al 19 and KC Shobhita et al 20 Whereas according to Sandra J Gendler et al, 10 the brown coloured cytoplasmic mucin component alone was considered positive for MUC1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One physical property of MUC1, i.e. the presence of sialic acid on the terminal carbohydrate structure, might be more important in determining the extent of metastasis, as sialylation of this part of the cell surface imparts a strong negative charge that affects invasion and metastasis (Shobhita et al, 2018).…”
Section: Oral Precancer and Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2F, G). A progressive increase in MUC1 expression from WDSCC to PDSCC might be due to aberrant glycosylation that occurs in increasing stages of OSCC, resulting in the shortening of the carbohydrate units and exposing more obscure antigens of peptide, and the carbohydrate composition of MUC1 makes it tumor speci c [15,21]. Donald et al also proved that MUC4 production may be a more biologically useful marker of the degree of differentiation [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%