2013
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0676-cp
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemistry Validation Procedures and Practices: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 727 Laboratories

Abstract: Objective.-To establish baseline parameters for IHC validation procedures and practice, and to assess their feasibility of implementation.Design.-In September 2010, a questionnaire was distributed by the College of American Pathologists. It was composed of 32 questions relating to nonpredictive assays as well as non-US Food and Drug Administration (non-FDA)-approved, predictive IHC assays other than human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2/neu).Results.-For non-FDA approved, nonpredictive IHC assays, 68% of labor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Unfortunately, a number of laboratories do not validate new antibodies according to validation standards. 27 In the present paper, we provide a validation for EP1 antibody clone in ER testing by IHC performed by the Pathology Service of the St-Sacrement Hospital, which is a breast cancer reference center in the Province of Quebec, Canada, according to recognized validation standards for ER testing. 20,24 Our results showed an excellent agreement between the previously used antibody clone (SP1) and the new EP1 antibody clone for ER status assessment in breast cancer using Dako autostaining technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Unfortunately, a number of laboratories do not validate new antibodies according to validation standards. 27 In the present paper, we provide a validation for EP1 antibody clone in ER testing by IHC performed by the Pathology Service of the St-Sacrement Hospital, which is a breast cancer reference center in the Province of Quebec, Canada, according to recognized validation standards for ER testing. 20,24 Our results showed an excellent agreement between the previously used antibody clone (SP1) and the new EP1 antibody clone for ER status assessment in breast cancer using Dako autostaining technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tables 2 and 3 display the results for the correlation between the immunocytochemical and immunohistochemical techniques in the leukoplakia and squamous cell carcinoma groups, indicating nonstatistically significant agreement. 12 This is the first study to assess the expression of adhesion (E-cadherin) and cell differentiation (involucrin) markers in exfoliated oral mucosal cells from leukoplakia and squamous cell carcinoma lesions using immunocytochemistry. In addition, the findings of the immunocytochemical and immunohistochemical analyses were correlated by using these markers in patients with the lesions described above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Given this inherent variability, there have been efforts to standardize these tests, and the US Food and Drug Administration, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists (CAP) have each provided special direction on some testing (eg, human epidermal growth factor 2 [HER2/neu]). 5,6 Whole slide imaging (WSI) with algorithmic analysis is one potential technology to improve the assessment of such markers (as shown in the Table). This has ranged from studies on basic H&E slides to IHC to multiparametric quantum dot staining.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%