2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40070821.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunologic changes after transfusion of autologous or allogeneic buffy coat‐poor versus WBC‐reduced blood transfusions in patients undergoing arthroplasty.II. Activation of T cells, macrophages, and cell‐mediated lympholysis

Abstract: Allogeneic transfusions seem to prolong the postoperative status of immune activation, even when WBC-filtered RBCs are used for the transfusion regimen.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…aBt is thought to bear the risk to induce a status of relative immunosuppression in the host by a decrease of natural killer cell activity, phagocytic activity, an increase in suppressor t-cell activity with inhibition of interleukin 2, and sfas ligand and shla molecule transfusion. [22][23][24][25][26][27] it has been hypothesized that disseminated tumor cells in patients undergoing potentially curative resections might escape immunologic surveillance and thereby disseminate predisposing the individual to an earlier recurrence. 22 transfusion-acquired immunomodulation after oncologic resection has been attributed as a potential risk factor for earlier recurrence best described for colorectal and hepatocellular carcinomas, as well as carcinoma of the pancreas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aBt is thought to bear the risk to induce a status of relative immunosuppression in the host by a decrease of natural killer cell activity, phagocytic activity, an increase in suppressor t-cell activity with inhibition of interleukin 2, and sfas ligand and shla molecule transfusion. [22][23][24][25][26][27] it has been hypothesized that disseminated tumor cells in patients undergoing potentially curative resections might escape immunologic surveillance and thereby disseminate predisposing the individual to an earlier recurrence. 22 transfusion-acquired immunomodulation after oncologic resection has been attributed as a potential risk factor for earlier recurrence best described for colorectal and hepatocellular carcinomas, as well as carcinoma of the pancreas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, T-cell numbers and function remain suppressed for up to 3 weeks after injury [21,34,35]. However, elevations of sIL-2R and neopterin, representing a sustained activation of the IFN-γ and TNF pathways, are not necessarily synonymous for an efficient immune response [36]. Although our data indicate a negative correlation between serum T 3 and sIL-2R, similarly to the findings by Boelen et al [5], we disagree with their conclusion implicating the low T 3 syndrome as the consequence rather than the cause of activation of the cytokine network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of suppressed T-cell proliferation (mixed lymphocyte culture test; MLC test), diminished cytolytic effector reaction (cell-mediated lymphocytotoxicity; CML) with continuous release of sIL-2R, s-TNFr and neopterin can be interpreted as a persistent but ineffective immune response. The fact that this type of immunomodulation was also found after administering leukocyte-filtered erythrocyte concentrates advocates that, in addition to the absolute leukocyte count, the length of storage and thus the viability of contaminating leukocytes plays a decisive role [6,7].…”
Section: Leukocyte Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%