Growth rates of diffusion cultures of nano-and microphytoplankton from Great Barrier Reef shelf water, especially diatoms (µ max = 3.2 doublings d -1), exceeded those of picocyanobacteria (Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus) when DIN (NH 4 + + NO 2 -+ NO 3 -) concentrations were ≥ 0.05 µM. The picocyanobacteria (µ max = 1.1 and 1.6 doublings d -1 for Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus respectively) achieved higher relative and absolute growth rates when time-averaged DIN concentrations were < 0.05 µM. Most estimates (71%) of in situ growth rates of nano-/microphytoplankton were ≤ 0.25 of µ max when DIN concentrations were < 0.1 µM, while only 18% of in situ picocyanobacteria growth rates were ≤ 0.25 of µ max when DIN concentrations were < 0.1 µM, the majority being ≥ 0.50 of µ max at such DIN concentrations. Thus growth rates of Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus populations did not appear to be significantly nutrient (nitrogen)-limited under ambient concentrations, and were of similar order to those measured in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, where NO 3 -concentrations (> 2 µM) are far above growth-saturating levels, and in the oligotrophic North Pacific Gyre. In contrast, for those nano-/microphytoplankton for which in situ or simulated in situ growth rates were estimated, growth rates appeared to be nitrogen-limited at DIN concentrations < 0.1 µM. The results provide further support for the hypothesis that picocyanobacteria dominate oligotrophic marine water columns because of their superior ability to grow at low nutrient concentrations.
KEY WORDS: Synechococcus · Prochlorococcus · Tropical nano-/microphytoplankton · Growth ratesResale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher Aquat Microb Ecol 24: 209-224, 2001 levels. As such, phytoplankton growth rates measured under existing conditions can be used to predict changes to phytoplankton standing stocks and primary productivity that might occur following increased nutrient concentrations and other changes to growth conditions. Bulk biochemical measurements provide one estimation of production, but cells, rather than carbon per se, are the major currency of phytoplanktonbased food webs (Banse 1992(Banse , 1994. Additionally, the extrapolation of biochemical measurements to phytoplankton growth rates is notoriously difficult and the resulting estimates can be substantially different from the true in situ growth rates (Furnas 1990).Picocyanobacteria-and diatom-based food chains co-exist in shelf waters of the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), but their relative importance varies in time and space (Furnas & Mitchell 1997). Resident phytoplankton populations have the capacity to develop significant blooms within 1 to 2 d when significant amounts of nutrients, particularly nitrogen, are introduced into shelf waters (Furnas & Mitchell 1997). During the months of monsoonal rainfall (November-April), the GBR shelf system may experience broad-scale, elevated water column nutrient concentrations (more than 10 times greater than 'normal') a...