2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02256556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunology

Abstract: It has been known for the past 85 years that mucosal responses can be stimulated by local presentation of antigen and that the gut immune system is capable of mounting both primary and secondary responses to potentially harmful antigens while avoiding the expression of damaging responses to harmless dietary proteins. How these types of responses are induced and regulated remains unclear. In the gut attention has for some time been focused on Peyer's patches (PP) due to evidence that they play a vital role in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This again sheds light on the specific function of IMACs and is in line with former reports demonstrating lower levels of MHC II molecules [22,27,28,29] and costimulatory molecules [22,30,31,32,33]. It is noteworthy that no specific part of the ubiquitinylation machinery or only the immune proteasome appears to be downregulated in IMACs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This again sheds light on the specific function of IMACs and is in line with former reports demonstrating lower levels of MHC II molecules [22,27,28,29] and costimulatory molecules [22,30,31,32,33]. It is noteworthy that no specific part of the ubiquitinylation machinery or only the immune proteasome appears to be downregulated in IMACs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, beyond the PAMPs/MAMPs engaging microbes or their products to trigger inflammatory responses, these processes are also linked to up-regulation of MHC class I and II molecules, costimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80, CD86), and adhesion molecules (Makala, Nishikawa, Suzuki and Nagasawa, 2004, Bailey, Carpentier, McMahon, Begolka and Miller, 2006, Ramachandra, Simmons and Harding, 2009) for various cell types. Both CD80 and CD86 levels were increased in healthy aged gingival tissues, and CD86 continued to increase in the periodontitis tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PRRs, localized either within endosomes or in the cell surface, can be expressed by intestinal epithelial cells, stromal cells, dendritic cells, macrophages and B and T cells (105). The cells of the intestinal adaptive immune system are distributed regularly throughout the mucosa in the form of organized lymphoid tissue structures of gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), or lamina propria, with intraepithelial cell populations (106). Such intestinal immune tissue can principally be grouped into inductive and effector sites.…”
Section: Effect Of Periodontal Pathogens On the Intestinal Immune Barrier Composition And Function Of The Intestinal Immune Barriermentioning
confidence: 99%