2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunomagnetic quantitative immuno-PCR for detection of less than one HIV-1 virion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The background signal has been attributed to nonspecific binding of the oligonucleotide-labeled secondary antibody, similar to the results observed for other immunodiagnostics (31). Although a number of approaches have been proposed to minimize the level of background amplification (32)(33)(34), no approach to date has proven successful at completely eliminating the background signal. For diagnosing Lyme disease, we propose that the iPCR background signal provides an intrinsic advantage due to the fact that a positive result is a relative measure above the established background threshold, thereby limiting the potential contribution of contamination, whereas a positive result for standard PCR is an absolute measure that can be highly sensitive to low-level laboratory contamination (7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The background signal has been attributed to nonspecific binding of the oligonucleotide-labeled secondary antibody, similar to the results observed for other immunodiagnostics (31). Although a number of approaches have been proposed to minimize the level of background amplification (32)(33)(34), no approach to date has proven successful at completely eliminating the background signal. For diagnosing Lyme disease, we propose that the iPCR background signal provides an intrinsic advantage due to the fact that a positive result is a relative measure above the established background threshold, thereby limiting the potential contribution of contamination, whereas a positive result for standard PCR is an absolute measure that can be highly sensitive to low-level laboratory contamination (7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Similar results were reported by Kwon et al (14), who evaluated fourth-generation (combination antigen-antibody) assays against the same panel of isolates. Furthermore, several anti-p24 antibodies that showed strong reactivity with the subtype B virus in our study have been reported to efficiently capture p24 in different assays (2,3,17), providing a foundation for the application of current HIV subtype B-specific antibodies in HIV diagnosis. However, variations in p24 monoclonal antibody reactivity among different subtypes have also been reported (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The total plasmid content of each inoculum was confirmed to be as expected (20). Whole-blood samples were collected from the three inoculated mice as well as one noninoculated mouse by submandibular bleed preinoculation and at days 1,3,4,7,9,11,14,16,18, and 21 postinfection. The coagulated blood was spun at 4,000 ϫ g for 9 min to prepare serum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Using iPCR, a typical 100-to 10,000-fold improvement over the detection limit of the EIA has been obtained in almost all applications (8). iPCR has been used to detect viral antigens (9), bacterial antigens (10), prions (11), and bacterial toxins (12). There has also been a limited application of iPCR for antibody detection, such as the measurement of mumps virusspecific immunoglobulin G in human serum (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%