1993
DOI: 10.1089/scd.1.1993.2.333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunomagnetic Separation of CD34+Cells from Human Bone Marrow, Cord Blood, and Mobilized Peripheral Blood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CD34+ cells were purified by an immunomagnetic method (Isolex system, Baxter, Santa Ana, Calif., USA), as described elsewhere [9]. This method does not affect the surface phenotype or the potential of these CD34+ cells for engraftment [10]. The PBSCs obtained from the two patients in complete remission were washed twice with a working solution (RPMI-1640 medium, Sigma, containing 0.4% sodium citrate and 0.9% human serum albumin) by centrifugation at 200  g for 10 min at room temperature to remove platelets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD34+ cells were purified by an immunomagnetic method (Isolex system, Baxter, Santa Ana, Calif., USA), as described elsewhere [9]. This method does not affect the surface phenotype or the potential of these CD34+ cells for engraftment [10]. The PBSCs obtained from the two patients in complete remission were washed twice with a working solution (RPMI-1640 medium, Sigma, containing 0.4% sodium citrate and 0.9% human serum albumin) by centrifugation at 200  g for 10 min at room temperature to remove platelets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CD34-positive selection using the Isolex 50 magnetic cell separation system (Baxter Immunotherapy Division, Santa Ana, CA, USA) from haploidentical father (cases 7, 10) and PBSC collection from HLA-match sibling was carried out as previously described. 18,22 In none of the cases were specific T cell depletion procedures employed. With bone marrow cells, the mononuclear cell number infused was a median 4.2 × 10 8 /kg (range 1.0 × 10 8 /kg to 4.8 x 10 8 /kg) and with the two cord blood infusions 6.8-10 × 10 7 /kg (as CFU-GM, 3.0-3.4 × 10 4 /kg) were given.…”
Section: Stem Cell Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 The two CD34 + stem cell selection systems adopted in clinical use are based on either biotin-avidin immunoadsorption (Ceprate SC) 17 or indirect immunomagnetic beads (Isolex 300). 18 Most clinical trials of TCD in allo-PBT by means of CD34 + positive selection (allo-PBT/CD34 + ) have been accomplished with the former method, [3][4][5][6][7] and few data about the use of immunomagnetic 520 CML = chronic myeloid leukemia; ALL = acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML = acute myeloblastic leukemia; CLL = chronic lymphocytic leukemia; NHL = non-Hodgkin lymphoma; MM = multiple myeloma; RAEBt = refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation; a = first complete remission or first chronic phase in CML; b = disease chemoresistant or in relapse; Cy = cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg); TBI = total body irradiation; Bu = busulfan (16 mg/kg); CsA = cyclosporin A; PDN = methylprednisolone; c 3 mg/kg ev from day Ϫ1, maintaining blood levels of 250-400 ng/ml; d 0.5 mg/kg day +7 to +14, 1 mg/kg day +15 to +28, tapering the doses afterwards; e days +1, +3, +6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%