Powerful and often complex regulatory mechanisms that maintain homeostasis are a sine qua non of all carefully studied physiologic activities. Thus, it is not surprising that the immune system has evolved a sophisticated regulatory apparatus for preventing excessive responses to antigenic stimulation. The specific mechanisms so far described include (a) classical antibody feedback which is believed to operate by interference with cellular recognition of antigenic determinants (1, 2) and (b) development of suppressor T lymphocytes (Ts) 1 (3, 4), recognizing either antigenic (5) or idiotypic (6) determinants and functioning in part by the release of subcellular effector molecules (7-10). Until now, these two broad categories have been considered as largely independent pathways. However, it would seem likely that to most efficiently control humoral immunity, some interrelationship between these modalities would have evolved.The initial purpose of these studies was to further characterize the triggering and mode of action of suppressor T cells and T-suppressor factors (T+F). Previous data have shown that Ts play a major role in the regulation of the Ir gene-controlled response to L-glutamic acid6°-L-alaninea°-L-tyrosine l° (GAT): GAT priming of nonresponder mice leads primarily to stimulation of GAT-specific T~ (11), which produce a soluble GAT TsF factor (GAT-TsF) (9) bearing I-region determinants and sharing a common idiotype with anti-GAT antibodies (12) that stimulates virgin T cells to develop T~ activity (GAT-T+F-induced Ts [T~]) (13). Furthermore, similar T~ and T+F can be obtained from responder lymphocytes, provided that antigen-presenting adherent cells are removed before GAT exposure (14).