AustraliaInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a highly debilitating and potentially fatal idiopathic disorder of the intestinal tract which is exceedingly prevalent in westernized society; however there is concern of an IBD epidemic in Asia due to increasing incidence rates. There is no cure for IBD with current treatments limited by their inefficacy, toxicity and adverse side-effects; thus necessitating the search for novel therapies. In the past decade mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have become attractive candidates for the cellular based therapy of IBD. MSCs are easily isolated and expanded from adult bone-marrow and adipose tissue; they possess unique therapeutic characteristics including the ability to home to sites of tissue damage and inflammation, facilitate tissue repair and modulate the immune system. The administration of MSCs in animal models of experimental colitis and clinical trials of fistulising and luminal Crohn's disease have yielded promising results, however an unequivocal therapeutic mechanism remains elusive. This review will explore the clinical application of MSCs in IBD and current evidence from experimental models of colitis elucidating their potential to ameliorate intestinal inflammation.Rec .The cause of IBD is unknown but concordant twin studies have revealed that the development of IBD is likely to require a multi-genetic predisposition and an environmental . The clinical application of MSCs in CD and evidence for the possible mechanisms elucidating their potential to regenerate intestinal epithelium and reduce inflammation in experimental models of colitis will be reviewed.
Efficacy of MSCs in Clinical TrialsClinical trials using MSCs for the treatment of CD fistulae and luminal inflammation have demonstrated that MSC therapy in IBD is both efficacious and feasible (summarised in . Furthermore, sustained closure of fistulae has been achieved in 88-100% of subjects 8-12 months after a course of MSC therapy 26,28) ; however these effects are relatively transient given that only 58% of subjects maintain closure after 3 years 29) . This suggests that repeated treatment may be required to maintain the therapeutic benefits of MSC therapy.While autologous and allogeneic AT-MSCs have both demonstrated efficacy in the healing of fistulae, further evidence is required to determine long-term immune tolerance in patients with repeated allogeneic MSC exposure.Bacterial contamination has posed a problem in the expansion of autologous MSCs in the past causing delay in treatment 24,30) . If allogeneic MSCs are determined to be equally efficacious, pre-prepared sources for treatment could prevent such setbacks.One clinical trial has determined that MSCs were as effective in treating fistulae of cryptoglandular origin as they were for fistulae resultant of CD 32,33) . In a study