2014
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12454
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunotherapy with histamine dihydrochloride and low‐dose interleukin‐2 favors sustained lymphocyte recovery in acute myeloid leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6D ). 39 The increment of lymphocyte counts between treatment cycles in this phase III trial likely reflected an accumulation of CD16 + NK cells, since CD16 + NK cells accounted for the majority (median 53%) of the lymphocyte increment between the onset of cycles 1 and 3 in the current phase IV Re:Mission trial using the identical treatment regimen. In agreement with the results in the Re:Mission trial, the lymphocyte induction between the onset of treatment and the start of cycle 3 in HDC/IL-2 treated patients in the phase III trial was predictive of LFS and OS ( Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6D ). 39 The increment of lymphocyte counts between treatment cycles in this phase III trial likely reflected an accumulation of CD16 + NK cells, since CD16 + NK cells accounted for the majority (median 53%) of the lymphocyte increment between the onset of cycles 1 and 3 in the current phase IV Re:Mission trial using the identical treatment regimen. In agreement with the results in the Re:Mission trial, the lymphocyte induction between the onset of treatment and the start of cycle 3 in HDC/IL-2 treated patients in the phase III trial was predictive of LFS and OS ( Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The validity of the latter finding was supported by post-hoc analyses of the results of a previous phase III trial, where induction of lymphocytes between cycles 1 and 3 was significantly associated with LFS and OS in patients randomized to receive HDC/IL-2 but not in untreated control patients. 39 Since CD56 bright NK cells are assumed to be the immediate precursors of CD16 + NK cells, 19-22 we hypothesize from these findings that the anti-leukemic efficacy of HDC/IL-2 immunotherapy results, at least in part, from initial activation and expansion of CD56 bright NK cells that subsequently differentiate into cytotoxic CD16 + cells. The finding of a significantly increased ratio of CD16 + to CD56 bright NK cell counts between the first days of cycles 1 and 3 supports that CD56 bright cells may have differentiated into cytotoxic CD16 + cells during immunotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of HDC to protect immune cells with tumor-killing capacity has been proposed to contribute to the clinical benefit of HDC-based therapy in AML ( 8 , 19 , 20 ). Anti-leukemic properties of HDC may alternatively or additionally relate to its pro-differentiating effects on myeloid cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Patients treated with HDC/IL2 and displaying lymphocyte induction between cycles 1 and 3 and between cycles 1 and 4 had an LFS of 57%, whereas patients with no lymphocyte induction had an LFS of 27%. 39 Together, these results suggest that IL2 may be beneficial in some patients, particularly if combined with HDC. One of the main limitations of the ELAM02 trial was the withdrawal of 41% of the eligible patients, mostly due to patient/ parental refusal, or medical reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%