2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in a stage IV melanoma patient during pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not have extensive obstetrical information because our database focuses on patients with melanoma and not their children. However, there is no evidence in our study that suggests melanoma affected the health of the children, which is in line with the obstetrical data from other recent studies, which includes two reports of placental metastases where both fetuses were unharmed [8,9,[13][14][15][17][18][19][20]. There is a single case series from 2003 that includes several fetal metastases that resulted in fetal demise [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We do not have extensive obstetrical information because our database focuses on patients with melanoma and not their children. However, there is no evidence in our study that suggests melanoma affected the health of the children, which is in line with the obstetrical data from other recent studies, which includes two reports of placental metastases where both fetuses were unharmed [8,9,[13][14][15][17][18][19][20]. There is a single case series from 2003 that includes several fetal metastases that resulted in fetal demise [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Before targeted therapy and immunotherapy were available, four women received chemotherapy and one received Gamma Knife radiosurgery [17]. Since the development of new therapies, two women received vemurafenib, one received ipilimumab alone, and two received ipilimumab plus nivolumab [8,9,[18][19][20]. One woman also became pregnant while being treated with nivolumab, which was stopped after the pregnancy was discovered [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of five cases have been reported (all in metastatic melanoma) of ICI administration in pregnancy: one introduced at week 9 of pregnancy, one in the second trimester, and in three cases conception occurred whilst the patient was receiving ICI (Supplementary Table S4, available at https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.199). [131][132][133][134] Obstetric complications occurred in three cases [one placental insufficiency and fetal bradycardia (ICI started at the ninth week; discontinued in the second trimester), 132 two intrauterine growth restrictions (in both, conception occurred on ICI; one discontinued in the first trimester and one continued until elective delivery at week 32) 131,135 ]; upon follow-up, all infants were meeting developmental milestones and/or were in good health. These limited cases illustrate that favourable outcomes can be achieved in fetuses with in utero ICI exposure and offer some experience for the management of pregnancies in patients on ICI, but the knowledge is extremely limited.…”
Section: Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their aim is to break immune tolerance for the tumor but they can also hinder maternal tolerance for the fetus, therefore increasing risk of spontaneous abortions. This is proved by animal studies for anti-PD-1 agents that are thus labeled as pregnancy category D for US FDA, but not for anti-CTLA4, labeled as FDA category C. The use of immunotherapy in pregnancy could lead to immune-related adverse effects and cause malformations and endocrine alterations in the newborn such as congenital hypothyroidism [ 47–49 ]. However good outcomes without apparent harm to the newborn are also reported for ipilimumab alone [ 50 ] and even for ipilimumab-nivolumab combination [ 48 ] suggesting that immune-mediated response to the fetus during the therapy could be patient specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%