2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep33721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMNGS: A comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies

Abstract: The SRA (Sequence Read Archive) serves as primary depository for massive amounts of Next Generation Sequencing data, and currently host over 100,000 16S rRNA gene amplicon-based microbial profiles from various host habitats and environments. This number is increasing rapidly and there is a dire need for approaches to utilize this pool of knowledge. Here we created IMNGS (Integrated Microbial Next Generation Sequencing), an innovative platform that uniformly and systematically screens for and processes all prok… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
332
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 375 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
332
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of combining a clone library with Sanger sequencing has often provided insufficient coverage to fully describe and compare microbial communities (Curtis et al, 2006). In contrast, NGS allows the collection of thousands of sequences from many samples simultaneously (Andersson et al, 2008;Danovaro et al, 2016;Hamady, Walker, Harris, Gold, & Knight, 2008) and can provide much deeper insights into the diversity of microbial communities (Herlemann et al, 2011;Lagkouvardos et al, 2016;Nair, Puthusseri, Vincent, & Bhat, 2017;Sogin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of combining a clone library with Sanger sequencing has often provided insufficient coverage to fully describe and compare microbial communities (Curtis et al, 2006). In contrast, NGS allows the collection of thousands of sequences from many samples simultaneously (Andersson et al, 2008;Danovaro et al, 2016;Hamady, Walker, Harris, Gold, & Knight, 2008) and can provide much deeper insights into the diversity of microbial communities (Herlemann et al, 2011;Lagkouvardos et al, 2016;Nair, Puthusseri, Vincent, & Bhat, 2017;Sogin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis pipelines, e.g. QIIME (Caporaso et al , 2010) mothur (Schloss et al , 2009), and IMNGS (Lagkouvardos et al , 2016), have tutorials and best practices with parameters that should be evaluated for appropriate use with a particular dataset. There are many approaches to analyzing 16S rRNA gene sequencing data and the following overview briefly highlights most commonly used methods.…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enterobacteriaceae are well known gut colonisers, and all the ESKAPE pathogens can be isolated from environmental sources [58], however systematic comparisons of isolation rates across environmental and animal sources are lacking. We used the IMNGS website [59] to query the growing body of publicly available 16S taxonomic profiling data for the presence of Gram negative opportunists across a wide range of sample types (Fig 3A). These data confirm the three Enterobacteriaceae species are frequent commensals of humans and animals, with E. coli the most commonly detected; however K. pneumoniae and E. cloaceae showed equivalent or even greater prevalence amongst plant and environmental samples (7--14%), whereas E. coli was significantly less common in these niches (3--4%, p=0.01).…”
Section: Ecological Rangementioning
confidence: 99%