1999
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.19.8.5441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imp3p and Imp4p, Two Specific Components of the U3 Small Nucleolar Ribonucleoprotein That Are Essential for Pre-18S rRNA Processing

Abstract: The function of the U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein (snoRNP) is central to the events surrounding prerRNA processing, as evidenced by the severe defects in cleavage of pre-18S rRNA precursors observed upon depletion of the U3 RNA and its unique protein components. Although the precise function of each component remains unclear, since U3 snoRNA levels remain unchanged upon genetic depletion of these proteins, it is likely that the proteins themselves have significant roles in the cleavage reactions. Here w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
158
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
158
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rcl1p was previously demonstrated to specifically associate with U3 snoRNP + To find out whether Bms1p interacts with snoRNAs, we carried out IP reactions using the strain BMS1-ProtA, which chromosomally expresses a Bms1p-ProtA fusion+ Control strains expressing other ProtA-tagged proteins: Nop1p, a protein associated with U3 and other C/D box snoRNAs, Lsm3p, a protein associated with the U6 spliceosomal RNA, and Rcl1p, were analyzed in parallel+ As shown in Figure 7, Bms1p-ProtA specifically precipitates low levels of U3 snoRNA but none of the other RNAs tested, representing members of either the C/D-or H/ACA-box snoRNA families (U14, snR190 and snR10, snR30, respectively)+ Similar results were obtained when IPs performed with the anti-HA antibody were carried out with extracts originating from strains expressing either Bms1p-HA or the HA-tagged Imp3p, another protein associating specifically with the U3 snoRNP (Lee & Baserga, 1999; data not shown)+ Interestingly, also in this case immunoprecipitation of U3 snoRNA with Bms1p-HA was much less effective than with Imp3p-HA+ The significance of the less efficient precipitation of U3 snoRNA with Bms1p than with Rcl1p is not understood at present+ Low recovery of U3 RNA may be related to the observed susceptibility of Bms1p to proteolytic degradation (see Fig+ 2C)+ Alternatively, it is possible that interaction of the 10S complex with the nascent ribosome is accompanied by a structural rearrangement resulting in weakening of the interaction between Bms1p and Rcl1p and/or U3 snoRNP (see Discussion)+ FIGURE 5. Depletion of Bms1p causes defects in rRNA processing at cleavage sites A 0 , A 1 , and A 2 + A: Structure of 35S pre-rRNA (upper portion) and a simplified scheme of pre-rRNA processing in yeast (lower portion)+ Processing sites and intermediates are indicated+ For more details, see Kressler et al+ (1999) and Venema and Tollervey (1999)+ B: Northern blotting and primer extension analysis of RNA isolated from WT and GAL::bms1 strains grown in YPGal (lanes 0) or YPD6% for 6, 12, 22, or 44 h+ The oligonucleotide probes, indicated on the scheme of the 35S pre-rRNA above the gels, were complementary to: 59ETS, upstream of A 0 (a); ITS1, upstream of A 2 (b); ITS1, between A 2 and A 3 (c); ITS1, downstream of A 3 (d); ITS2, upstream of C 2 (e); mature 25S rRNA (f ); and mature 18S rRNA (g)+ Positions of different processing intermediates and mature rRNAs are indicated.…”
Section: Bms1p Immunoprecipitates Low Levels Of U3 Snornasupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Rcl1p was previously demonstrated to specifically associate with U3 snoRNP + To find out whether Bms1p interacts with snoRNAs, we carried out IP reactions using the strain BMS1-ProtA, which chromosomally expresses a Bms1p-ProtA fusion+ Control strains expressing other ProtA-tagged proteins: Nop1p, a protein associated with U3 and other C/D box snoRNAs, Lsm3p, a protein associated with the U6 spliceosomal RNA, and Rcl1p, were analyzed in parallel+ As shown in Figure 7, Bms1p-ProtA specifically precipitates low levels of U3 snoRNA but none of the other RNAs tested, representing members of either the C/D-or H/ACA-box snoRNA families (U14, snR190 and snR10, snR30, respectively)+ Similar results were obtained when IPs performed with the anti-HA antibody were carried out with extracts originating from strains expressing either Bms1p-HA or the HA-tagged Imp3p, another protein associating specifically with the U3 snoRNP (Lee & Baserga, 1999; data not shown)+ Interestingly, also in this case immunoprecipitation of U3 snoRNA with Bms1p-HA was much less effective than with Imp3p-HA+ The significance of the less efficient precipitation of U3 snoRNA with Bms1p than with Rcl1p is not understood at present+ Low recovery of U3 RNA may be related to the observed susceptibility of Bms1p to proteolytic degradation (see Fig+ 2C)+ Alternatively, it is possible that interaction of the 10S complex with the nascent ribosome is accompanied by a structural rearrangement resulting in weakening of the interaction between Bms1p and Rcl1p and/or U3 snoRNP (see Discussion)+ FIGURE 5. Depletion of Bms1p causes defects in rRNA processing at cleavage sites A 0 , A 1 , and A 2 + A: Structure of 35S pre-rRNA (upper portion) and a simplified scheme of pre-rRNA processing in yeast (lower portion)+ Processing sites and intermediates are indicated+ For more details, see Kressler et al+ (1999) and Venema and Tollervey (1999)+ B: Northern blotting and primer extension analysis of RNA isolated from WT and GAL::bms1 strains grown in YPGal (lanes 0) or YPD6% for 6, 12, 22, or 44 h+ The oligonucleotide probes, indicated on the scheme of the 35S pre-rRNA above the gels, were complementary to: 59ETS, upstream of A 0 (a); ITS1, upstream of A 2 (b); ITS1, between A 2 and A 3 (c); ITS1, downstream of A 3 (d); ITS2, upstream of C 2 (e); mature 25S rRNA (f ); and mature 18S rRNA (g)+ Positions of different processing intermediates and mature rRNAs are indicated.…”
Section: Bms1p Immunoprecipitates Low Levels Of U3 Snornasupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In this work, we show that Bms1p is a protein partner of Rcl1p in the yeast S. cerevisiae+ Like Rcl1p, Bms1p is an essential, evolutionarily conserved, nucleolar protein required for pre-rRNA processing at sites A 0 , A 1 , and A 2 , and the formation of 40S ribosomal subunits+ Bms1p and Rcl1p are components of a complex sedimenting on glycerol gradients at around 10S, which appears to associate with the U3 snoRNP at the level of nascent ribosomes+ Bms1p contains an evolutionarily conserved G-protein-like domain, suggesting that the protein may play an important regulatory role in pre-rRNA processing in the nucleolus+ Several independent lines of evidence support the conclusion that Bms1p is a true partner of Rcl1p+ The two proteins interact with each other in the yeast twohybrid system and coprecipitate together in extracts prepared from a strain expressing ProtA-tagged Bms1p+ Moreover, depletion of either Bms1p or Rcl1p results in a similar, though not identical, processing defect+ Both proteins strongly affect cleavages at sites A 1 and A 2 + However, the effect on processing at site A 0 is more pronounced in the absence of Bms1p than Rcl1p+ Bms1p and Rcl1p are detected in complexes of similar sizes+ Most significantly, association of Rcl1p with the prominent 10S complex is strongly diminished upon depletion of Bms1p, as is its association with structures sedimenting at ;40S and 70-90S that most likely represent nascent ribosomes at different stages of maturation+ This effect is Bms1p-specific, as depletion of Imp3p, another protein required for pre-rRNA processing at sites A 0 -A 2 (Lee & Baserga, 1999), does not result in any major change of Rcl1p distribution+ Despite the fact that neither Rcl1p nor Bms1p cosediments on gradients with the U3 monoparticle, both proteins specifically immunoprecipitate the U3 snoRNA, though with very different efficiencies+ Most probably, Rcl1p and Bms1p associate with U3 at the level of nascent ribosomes ; this work)+ The observation that the association of Rcl1p with the 70-90S and 40S complexes depends on the availability of Bms1p strongly argues for the importance of the Bms1p-Rcl1p interaction for this association+ Are Rcl1p and Bms1p the only components of the 10S complex? We have carried out experiments with extracts prepared from yeast strains expressing either Rcl1p or Bms1p tagged with the calmodulin binding peptide and ProtA (TAP-tag; Rigaut et al+, 1999)+ In FIGURE 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The hinge region, the spacing between the 59 and 39 domains of the U3 snoRNA, is one of the least understood segments of the U3 snoRNA+ In yeast, the hinge region encompasses nt 39 to 72+ A hairpin called helix 1b9 has been proposed to exist in snoRNPs in solution within these boundaries (Segault et al+, 1992;Mereau et al+, 1997)+ Helix 1b9 is sometimes drawn as part of a larger helix termed helix 1b or stem-loop 1b (Segault et al+, 1992;Mereau et al+, 1997;Antal et al+, 2000)+ Although the primary sequence of the hinge region differs among eukaryotic organisms, its length is fairly well conserved (between 34 and 37 nt; Samarsky & Fournier, 1998)+ The 59 portion of the hinge region (nt 39-48) base pairs with the pre-rRNA as a prerequisite for the cleavage reaction at A0 (Beltrame & Tollervey, 1992, 1995Beltrame et al+, 1994)+ Therefore portions of both the 59 domain and the hinge region base pair with the pre-rRNA to effect pre-rRNA cleavage+ Because of these RNA-RNA interactions, the two hairpins in the 59 domain and hinge region of the U3 snoRNA are not likely to exist in vivo (Antal et al+, 2000;Borovjagin & Gerbi, 2000)+ The U3 snoRNA is complexed with both proteins common to box C/D snoRNPs and proteins specific for the U3 snoRNP+ The common proteins, conserved from yeast to humans, are fibrillarin (Nop1p), Nop56p, Nop5/ Nop58p, and Snu13p (Schimmang et al+, 1989;Henriquez et al+, 1990;Tollervey et al+, 1991Tollervey et al+, , 1993Gautier et al+, 1997;Wu et al+, 1998;Lafontaine & Tollervey, 1999;Watkins et al+, 2000)+ In addition, the U3 snoRNP contains at least seven other proteins that are not components of any other snoRNP-Sof1p, Mpp10p, Imp3p, Imp4p, Lcp5p, Rrp9p, and Dhr1p (Jansen et al+, 1993;Dunbar et al+, 1997;Wiederkehr et al+, 1998;Wu et al+, 1998;Lee & Baserga, 1999;Colley et al+, 2000;Venema et al+, 2000)+ Mpp10p, Imp3p, Imp4p, Rrp9p, and the common proteins have known metazoan homologs (Gautier et al+, 1997;Pluk et al+, 1998;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%