2014
DOI: 10.5516/net.06.2013.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact Analyses and Tests of Concrete Overpacks of Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Casks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sugano et al [5] conducted an experimental study on a target block subjected to a full-scale F4 fighter jet to determine the impact load-time function during aircraft impact. Lee et al [13] studied local damage to reinforced concrete (RC) panels subjected to scaled engine of commercial aircraft and Zhang et al [14] studied impact resistance of ultrahigh performance steel fibre reinforced concrete panels subjected to actual and scaled engines of fighter jet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugano et al [5] conducted an experimental study on a target block subjected to a full-scale F4 fighter jet to determine the impact load-time function during aircraft impact. Lee et al [13] studied local damage to reinforced concrete (RC) panels subjected to scaled engine of commercial aircraft and Zhang et al [14] studied impact resistance of ultrahigh performance steel fibre reinforced concrete panels subjected to actual and scaled engines of fighter jet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Rosner & Goldberg ), the physical resilience of the containment (Lee et al . ) and the end‐of‐life considerations (Howard & van den Akker ). One identified advantage is retaining flexibility to deploy alternative solutions such as fuel recycling.…”
Section: Forming a Viable Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Werner 2012). The advantages of this approach have been documented along with operational and maintenance requirements (Bunn et al 2001;Hamal et al 2011;Rosner & Goldberg 2013), the physical resilience of the containment (Lee et al 2014) and the end-of-life considerations (Howard & van den Akker 2014). One identified advantage is retaining flexibility to deploy alternative solutions such as fuel recycling.…”
Section: Forming a Viable Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%