2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(99)00166-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact and delamination failure of woven-fabric composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
183
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
183
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…damages upon the structural life of the material [6][7][8], produce a more favourable result than the one caused upon similar fibre and matrix UD material systems [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…damages upon the structural life of the material [6][7][8], produce a more favourable result than the one caused upon similar fibre and matrix UD material systems [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fracture mechanisms and failure sequences are documented from observations [6][7][8] but parametric analytic formulations for predicting the impact performance have not attained yet the maturity level of the unidirectional ones.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the absence of through-thickness reinforcement, thermosetting polymer based 4 composites have low interlaminar and intralaminar fracture toughness, making them susceptible to matrix-5 dominated cracking [1,2]. Many techniques have been developed to address these drawbacks by, for 6 example, inserting out-of-plane fibers through mechanical punching [3], stitching [4], 3D weaving [5], 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is proposed that the trend observed in the work is influenced from the local fluctuations in toughness throughout the interlaminar region, which is expected to result from the bi-directional weave. In addition to the observed step-like load behaviour, bi-directional cross-plies have higher fracture toughness than UD due to the 90 o fibres acting as built-in crack arrestors [51], but, they do not display fibre bridging. Thus, comparisons with UD interlaminar fracture toughness testing should be avoided, as fibre bridging is an effective artificial fracture toughness enhancer [52,53].…”
Section: Interlaminar Fracture Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 92%