2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-750x(99)00119-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact Assessment Methodologies for Microfinance: Theory, Experience and Better Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
229
0
16

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
229
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological issues involved have been surveyed by Hulme (2000) who identifies three different paradigms: the scientific method, the humanistic tradition, and participatory action learning (PLA). Six methodologies used to assess outreach-the social bottom line-deserve further discussion: IMP-ACT, AIMS, SROI, Accion PAF, CGAP (PAT) and SPI.…”
Section: Spimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological issues involved have been surveyed by Hulme (2000) who identifies three different paradigms: the scientific method, the humanistic tradition, and participatory action learning (PLA). Six methodologies used to assess outreach-the social bottom line-deserve further discussion: IMP-ACT, AIMS, SROI, Accion PAF, CGAP (PAT) and SPI.…”
Section: Spimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other subjects of considerable research, and indeed debate, include issues of differential impact according to borrowers' poverty levels (Coleman 2006;Islam 2007;Khandker 2005;Mosley and Hulme 1998) and the reconcilability of the economic viability of microfinance programs' with their objective of alleviating poverty (Copestake 2007;Morduch 2000;Rahman 2004;Woller and Woodworth 2001;Woolcock 2006). As the goals of development have been broadened, research attention has turned toward the social and political impacts of microcredit (Develtere and Huybrechts 2005;Hulme 2000). In particular its potential to empower women has been much discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to this is the observation that little ethnographic research on consequences to microcredit users has been carried out . Qualitative approaches have been recognized as in a privileged position to unravel and interpret the processes at play in microcredit interventions (Hulme 2000;Rahman 1999). Still, to date microcredit has received limited sociological and anthropological attention (recent exceptions include , Lont and Hospes (2004) and Perry (2002)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned by Hulme (1997), "behind all microfinance programs is the assumption that intervention will change human behaviors and practices in ways that lead to the achievement (or raise the probability of achievement) of desired outcomes." The conceptual model of impact chain presents a complex set of links as each 'effect' becomes a 'cause' in its own right generating further effects.…”
Section: Conceptual Model and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%