2015
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/87/1/012100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact comparative study of phone carcasses behavior by FEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with the radius for the ball R = 3.15 mm, the reduced elastic modulus E r calculated from equation (1) with E s = 213 GPa and ν s = 0.29 for the AISI 52100 SKF bearing steel ball, and L is the applied load. Average values E p = 3.3 GPa (from data in Table 2) and Poisson's ratio ν p = 0.38 (21) were utilized for the specimens. Equation 2gives contact pressure p 0 values of 104, 150, 189, and 224 MPa for applied loads of 1, 3, 6, and 10 N, respectively, as indicated in Table 3.…”
Section: Tribological Characterization 331 Influence Of Applied Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the radius for the ball R = 3.15 mm, the reduced elastic modulus E r calculated from equation (1) with E s = 213 GPa and ν s = 0.29 for the AISI 52100 SKF bearing steel ball, and L is the applied load. Average values E p = 3.3 GPa (from data in Table 2) and Poisson's ratio ν p = 0.38 (21) were utilized for the specimens. Equation 2gives contact pressure p 0 values of 104, 150, 189, and 224 MPa for applied loads of 1, 3, 6, and 10 N, respectively, as indicated in Table 3.…”
Section: Tribological Characterization 331 Influence Of Applied Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%