2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact damage tolerance of thermoset composites reinforced with hybrid commingled yarns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These specimens were subsequently scanned using a C-scan system to obtain damage maps [7,8,24,31]. Specimen cross-sections along the 0°, 45° and 90° fibre directions were extracted from selected impacted specimens for optical microscopy [32][33][34]. The microscopic analysis yielded further insight into composite damage arising from low velocity impact.…”
Section: Ansari and Chakrabartimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These specimens were subsequently scanned using a C-scan system to obtain damage maps [7,8,24,31]. Specimen cross-sections along the 0°, 45° and 90° fibre directions were extracted from selected impacted specimens for optical microscopy [32][33][34]. The microscopic analysis yielded further insight into composite damage arising from low velocity impact.…”
Section: Ansari and Chakrabartimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that an effective approach to enhance the impact performance of woven composite laminates is to use hybrid fiber systems—by combining either different fabric types (ie, hybrid layup) or different warp and fill yarns (ie, hybrid weave), or commingled fibers (ie, hybrid yarns). In addition, hybrid matrix systems, for example, nano‐ or micro‐particle modified thermoset resins and nonwoven thermoplastic interlayers, could provide opportunities to manipulate failure mechanisms at multiple length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the core layer is a brittle material, the fast rebound of the face sheet under the impact will result in debonding at the interface between the face sheet and the core. Selver et al [44] mentioned that larger dent depths in the structure may be attributed to impact energy that was absorbed by a smaller area, which generates a greater plasticity of the composite, stiffness degradation, and more localized damage under the hemispherical steel impactor. The evolution of the damage area with impact energy for the optimum banana/epoxy sandwich structure is presented in Figure 9.…”
Section: Low-velocity Impact Response Of Sandwich Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%