2016
DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000106
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact Evaluation of PRONTO Mexico

Abstract: Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to this trial, a different simulated training in Mexico, Programa de Rescate Obstétrico y Neonatal Tratamiento Óptimo y Oportuno , reported improved clinical practices but no reduction in obstetric haemorrhage cases41—probably also because AMTSL was already well implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Similar to this trial, a different simulated training in Mexico, Programa de Rescate Obstétrico y Neonatal Tratamiento Óptimo y Oportuno , reported improved clinical practices but no reduction in obstetric haemorrhage cases41—probably also because AMTSL was already well implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“… 14 PRONTO training focusing on intrapartum and immediate neonatal care improved use of evidence-based practices and decreased neonatal mortality in India and Mexico. 17 , 18 Lastly, quality improvement collaboratives alone do not affect patient outcomes consistently, but are effective in concert with provider training. 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in low-resource settings have used SPs to evaluate quality of health service delivery [ 20 , 24 26 ], but there are few examples of SP training interventions. Emerging evidence suggests that this methodology not only improves service delivery, but can also improve patient outcomes [ 27 , 28 ]. Given the success of SP programs in other settings, it is plausible that high-quality, patient-centered approaches could fill this “know-do gap” in quality, and increase retention in care among HIV-positive AYA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%