2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019je006172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact Gardening as a Constraint on the Age, Source, and Evolution of Ice on Mercury and the Moon

Abstract: We update an analytic impact gardening model (Costello et al., 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.05.023) to calculate the depth gardened by impactors on the Moon and Mercury and assess the implications of our results for the age, extent, and source of water ice deposits on both planetary bodies. We show that if the water presently on the Moon has a primordial origin, it may have been 4–15 m thick. If ice deposits are buried, they may be as shallow as 3 cm or as deep as 10 m and provide a gradient of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
3
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model captures four major features: (1) ice delivered by hydrated asteroids and volcanic outgassing; (2) ejecta emplaced by the large craters that we age‐dated; (3) a simplified estimate of ice loss; and (4) a proxy for smaller‐scale gardening. Our model is dissimilar to those explored by Cannon et al (2020), Costello et al (2020), or Hurley et al (2012), which operated at much smaller scales.…”
Section: Stratigraphy Simulationscontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model captures four major features: (1) ice delivered by hydrated asteroids and volcanic outgassing; (2) ejecta emplaced by the large craters that we age‐dated; (3) a simplified estimate of ice loss; and (4) a proxy for smaller‐scale gardening. Our model is dissimilar to those explored by Cannon et al (2020), Costello et al (2020), or Hurley et al (2012), which operated at much smaller scales.…”
Section: Stratigraphy Simulationscontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Impact cratering has been the dominant process affecting the lunar poles, but the effects of large polar craters on nearby ice deposits have not been previously addressed. Impact effects have been considered for micrometeoroids (e.g., Farrell et al, 2019) and small impactors (Cannon & Britt, 2020; Costello et al, 2020; Crider & Vondrak, 2003; Hurley et al, 2012). The large polar craters (>20 km diameter) each formed at a distinct point in lunar history (Deutsch et al, 2020; Tye et al, 2015), and during crater formation, these impacts would have emplaced ejecta out to significant distances (e.g., McGetchin et al, 1973), affecting existing ice deposits in the surrounding terrains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gardening by primary impacts falls short of the apparent mixing of space‐weathering products by orders of magnitude (Costello et al., 2018; Gault et al., 1974). In contrast, gardening by lunar secondary impacts represented by the Moon saturation contour has been shown to reproduce the depth of impact gardening on the Moon as evidenced by the distribution of surface‐correlated space weathering produces in the Apollo cores (Costello et al., 2020). The saturation contour shows that secondary impacts on the Moon thoroughly mix the top 1 m of lunar regolith over 1 Ga. On Ceres, the high secondary production model predicts that only the top 1 mm has been thoroughly reworked in 1 Ga.…”
Section: Results: Gardening Depths On Ceresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equilibrium gardening describes gardening where 2% of the points in a plane at the gardening depth have been inside the ejected volume of an impact crater at least once and can be used to understand less complete mixing or capture the mixing effects of impacts beyond the excavation zone. Modeled saturation gardening on the Moon has reproduced the homogenous depth‐distribution of cosmogenic radionuclides and space weathering products observed in the Apollo cores (Morris, 1978), and equilibrium gardening has reproduced the rate at which density anomalous cold spots and albedo anomalous rays fade into background regolith (Costello et al., 2020; Hawke et al., 2004; Williams et al., 2018). On Ceres, saturation gardening represents thorough mixing of surface material, while equilibrium gardening represents degradation by impact effects, but not necessarily homogenous vertical mixing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation