1932
DOI: 10.1680/imotp.1932.13318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact in Railway Bridges.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A value of 0•08 is typical for steel bridges with a span of 20 m or more, and 0•11 for 11 m spans. The effects on the bridge can be estimated conservatively by assuming that the driving wheels are spinning while stationary at the mid-span of the bridge, as has been justified by Inglis (1932). Table 6 shows the number of blows (N) and magnification factor (α) for each locomotive type considered by the authors.…”
Section: Dynamic Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value of 0•08 is typical for steel bridges with a span of 20 m or more, and 0•11 for 11 m spans. The effects on the bridge can be estimated conservatively by assuming that the driving wheels are spinning while stationary at the mid-span of the bridge, as has been justified by Inglis (1932). Table 6 shows the number of blows (N) and magnification factor (α) for each locomotive type considered by the authors.…”
Section: Dynamic Factormentioning
confidence: 99%