2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.06.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact load identification of composite structure using genetic algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the reconstructed impact force is qualitatively high comparing to previous works [1,2,4]. However, the variation in different case studies and measurement methods is a significant factor in the accuracy of the results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy of the reconstructed impact force is qualitatively high comparing to previous works [1,2,4]. However, the variation in different case studies and measurement methods is a significant factor in the accuracy of the results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Indirect methods for impact force identification have attracted researchers due to the nonlinearity of the impact problem and complexity of impact incidents [1,2,3,4]. Numerous techniques have been developed which uses inverse methods for impact force identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input values are The node numbers of the input layer and output layer are the number of input and output values in the network, respectively. The node number of the hidden layer can be determined by [19] = √ + + ,…”
Section: Type Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of computation amount, the discrete convolution relation of model function is more complex, resulting in a heavy workload [5,16,17]. With the development of computer technology, new algorithms have been introduced into the field of load recognition [18][19][20][21][22]. Neural networks are being developed and have excellent potential in this area [3,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is challenging to set an optimal sampling time interval to balance the tradeoff between reconstruction accuracy and efficiency. Approaches based on various basis functions were proposed to address this challenge, in which unknown dynamic forces were approximated by 2 Shock and Vibration basis functions, such as Gaussian basis functions [14], Bspline functions [15,16], triangle functions [17], exponential function [18], and Daubechies wavelet [19], and subsequently they were reconstructed by identifying the coefficients in these basis functions. These approaches could significantly reduce the number of unknowns (considerably less than that of data points) and shorten the identification time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%