2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact model for micrometer-sized sand particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectrum of COR values of LBS grains impacting on stainless steel surfaces lies in the same range of values obtained by Yu and Tafti (2016) for quartz sand grains at similar velocities. Similar to CSB and GB, the COR values of LBS were higher and lower when they were impacting on surfaces of granite and rubber blocks, respectively.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Restitution Of Natural Soil Grainssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The spectrum of COR values of LBS grains impacting on stainless steel surfaces lies in the same range of values obtained by Yu and Tafti (2016) for quartz sand grains at similar velocities. Similar to CSB and GB, the COR values of LBS were higher and lower when they were impacting on surfaces of granite and rubber blocks, respectively.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Restitution Of Natural Soil Grainssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…From Table 3 and Figure 15, the increasing order of energy loss for LBS grains impacting on various surfaces are granite (37%), stainless steel (53%), brass (69%) and rubber (82%). Compared with GB and CSB, greater degree of scatter in the COR values was observed for fairly regular shaped LBS grains as individual grains can vary in elastic and morphological characteristics (Penumadu et al, 2009, Yu andTafti, 2016). Additionally, the surface roughness and minor irregularities in shape may also have contributed to these higher deviations observed.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Restitution and Energy Lossmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10,11 The particle jet is essentially a particular case of the abrasive jets which grind the tools less. 21 In addition, the reason for rock breaking has been studied by many scholars, [22][23][24] and tensile fracture caused by the shock pressure wave of abrasion was the main reason for the rock breaking. [12][13][14][15][16][17] The cutting volume and depth efficiency tend to increase with increasing water pressure and traverse speed and are strongly dependent on the standoff distance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold strain is a function of the impact and rotating velocity and the particle surface contact time. 21 In addition, the reason for rock breaking has been studied by many scholars, [22][23][24] and tensile fracture caused by the shock pressure wave of abrasion was the main reason for the rock breaking. 25,26 According to the high-efficiency rock-breaking characteristics of particle jets and inspired by projectile impact rock breaking, Curlett et al 9 proposed particle impact drilling (PID) technology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%