2018
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201804032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of 2‐Ethylhexyl Stereoisomers on the Electrical Performance of Single‐Crystal Field‐Effect Transistors

Abstract: Many organic semiconductors (OSCs) inherit chiral alkyl chains, which ensure the desirable high solubility for solution-processing but may also lead to disorder, inhomogeneous film-formation, as well as interfacial defects due to the presence of mixtures of stereoisomers or diastereomers, which impair their peak performance. Here, single-crystal field-effect transistors (SCFETs) of a diketopyrrolopyrrole-based organic semiconductor with chiral 2-ethylhexyl substituents by sublimation in air and organic ribbon … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enantiomers RR ‐39 and SS ‐39 exhibited improved mobility values of 4.1–4.5 × 10 −4 cm 2 V −1 s −1 , whereas the best performance was observed for the achiral compound and meso ‐39 , µ ( h + ) = 1.7 × 10 −3 cm 2 . These results are corroborated by the ones obtained by Würthner et al with single crystal OFETs of DPP RR ‐40 , SS ‐40 , and meso ‐40 that affords mobility values of µ ( h + ) = 0.79, 0.79, and 3.4 cm 2 V −1 s −1 . Why do meso compounds give rise to higher mobility than pure isomers?…”
Section: Charge Transportsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The enantiomers RR ‐39 and SS ‐39 exhibited improved mobility values of 4.1–4.5 × 10 −4 cm 2 V −1 s −1 , whereas the best performance was observed for the achiral compound and meso ‐39 , µ ( h + ) = 1.7 × 10 −3 cm 2 . These results are corroborated by the ones obtained by Würthner et al with single crystal OFETs of DPP RR ‐40 , SS ‐40 , and meso ‐40 that affords mobility values of µ ( h + ) = 0.79, 0.79, and 3.4 cm 2 V −1 s −1 . Why do meso compounds give rise to higher mobility than pure isomers?…”
Section: Charge Transportsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The optimum charge transport performances are generally obtained for 8–12 carbon atoms . Branching has evidently been explored as a strategy to enhance solubility and modulate packing, but at the eventual expenses of creating a stereogenic center . Triisopropylsylil, triethylsilyl, and triethylgermyl are among popular unconventional bulky side groups as can be seen in compounds 4 , 5a,b , 6 , 26 , and 28 .…”
Section: Charge Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the dependence on electron mobility by different chiralities of NDI derivatives, introducing those with nonlinear shapes of side‐chains in this work, is rather different from that of previous studies on chiral organic semiconductors. For example, in DPP stereoisomers with chiral branched alkyl (2‐ethylhexyl) side groups, DPP mesomers exhibit higher hole mobility than DPP enantiomers . However, the trend of electron mobility of NDI stereoisomers is not valid in this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(OFETs), organic photovoltaics (OPVs), chiral sensors, and perovskite solar cells (PSCs). [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] A change in the stereochemical purity of chiral organic semiconductors strongly influences their charge transporting properties, crystal characteristics, blend morphology, and optical responses. For example, in diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) stereoisomers consisting of two chiral 2-ethylhexyl side groups, DPP mesomers exhibit higher hole mobility than DPP enantiomers due to their larger area and tighter packing of π-π stacking interactions between DPP cores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation